Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918874›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2023

Understanding the barriers and facilitators to using self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne viruses: Thematic analyses for intervention optimization.

Paul Flowers, Gabriele Vojt, Maria Pothoulaki, Fiona Mapp, Melvina Woode Owusu, Claudia Estcourt, Jackie A Cassell, John Saunders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul FlowersSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-5616
Gabriele VojtDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-0684
Maria PothoulakiDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-1446
Fiona MappDepartment of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-6036
Melvina Woode OwusuDepartment of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-3802
Claudia EstcourtDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-5630
Jackie A CassellDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-0385
John SaundersDepartment of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3020-9916
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Brighton · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research RP-PG-0614-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelf-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and blood-borne viruses (BBVs) are widely offered. There are ongoing problems with reach and sample return rates. The packs have arisen without formal intervention development. This paper illustrates initial steps of an intervention optimization process to improve the packs.

methodsEleven focus groups and seven interviews were conducted with convenience samples of patients recruited from sexual health clinics and members of the public (n = 56). To enable intervention optimization, firstly, we conducted an inductive appraisal of the behavioural system of using the pack to understand meaningful constituent behavioural domains. Subsequently, we conducted a thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to enacting each sequential behavioural domain in preparation for future behaviour change wheel analysis.

resultsOverall, we found that self-sampling packs were acceptable. Participants understood their overall logic and value as a pragmatic intervention that simultaneously facilitated and reduced barriers to individuals being tested for STIs and BBVs. However, at the level of each behavioural domain (e.g., reading leaflets, returning samples) problems with the pack were identified, as well as a series of potential optimizations, which might widen the reach of self-sampling and increase the return of viable samples.

conclusionsThis paper provides an example of a pragmatic approach to optimizing an intervention already widely offered globally. The paper demonstrates the added value health psychological approaches offer; conceptualizing interventions in behavioural terms, pinpointing granular behavioural problems amenable for systematic further improvement.

Indexed as

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesVirusesHumansbarriersblood-borne virusesfacilitatorsintervention optimizationqualitativeself-samplingsexual healthsexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID35918874
PMCPMC10086833
OpenAlexW4289520281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.