Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918694›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Stimuli-responsive nanoformulations for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.

Tianxu Fang, Xiaona Cao, Mysha Ibnat, Guojun Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Metal-Based Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianxu FangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 0B1, Canada.
Xiaona CaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 0B1, Canada.
Mysha IbnatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 0B1, Canada.
Guojun ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 0B1, Canada. guojun.chen@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-02669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 technology has changed the landscape of genome editing and has demonstrated extraordinary potential for treating otherwise incurable diseases. Engineering strategies to enable efficient intracellular delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 components has been a central theme for broadening the impact of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Various non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR-Cas9 have been investigated given their favorable safety profiles over viral systems. Many recent efforts have been focused on the development of stimuli-responsive non-viral CRISPR-Cas9 delivery systems, with the goal of achieving efficient and precise genome editing. Stimuli-responsive nanoplatforms are capable of sensing and responding to particular triggers, such as innate biological cues and external stimuli, for controlled CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. In this Review, we overview the recent advances in stimuli-responsive nanoformulations for CRISPR-Cas9 delivery, highlight the rationale of stimuli and formulation designs, and summarize their biomedical applications.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene Transfer TechniquesCRISPR-Cas9Drug deliveryExternal stimuliGenome editingInternal stimuliNanoformulationsStimuli-responsive

Identifiers

PMID35918694
PMCPMC9344766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.