Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918693›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Rural-urban correlates of modern contraceptives utilization among adolescents in Zambia: a national cross-sectional survey.

Quraish Sserwanja, Milton W Musaba, Linet M Mutisya, David Mukunya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Quraish SserwanjaPrograms Department, GOAL, Arkaweet Block 65 House No. 227, Khartoum, Sudan. qura661@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0576-4627
Milton W MusabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-4044
Linet M MutisyaMaternal and Child Health Project, Swedish Organization for Global Health, Mayuge, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-8397
David MukunyaDepartment of Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3892-9777
Busitema University · UGNile Valley University · SDWorld Health Organization - Uganda · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern contraceptive use among adolescents is low despite the adverse effects of adolescent pregnancies. Understanding correlates of modern contraceptive use in different settings is key to the design of effective context-specific interventions. We aimed to determine factors associated with modern contraceptives use among adolescents in rural and urban settings of Zambia.

methodsWe analyzed secondary data from 2018 Zambia demographic and health survey (ZDHS) focusing on adolescent girls aged 15-19 years. We used multivariable logistic regression in SPSS version 25 to examine rural-urban variations in factors associated with modern contraceptive utilization.

resultsOverall, 12.0% (360/3000, 95% CI: 10.9-13.2) of adolescents in Zambia were using modern contraceptives. Use of modern contraceptives was higher in rural areas at 13.7% (230/1677, 95% CI: 12.1-15.3) compared to 9.8% (130/1323, 95% CI: 8.3-11.6) in urban areas. In the rural areas, having a child (aOR = 13.99; 95% CI 8.60-22.77), being married (aOR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.42-3.18), being older at 19 years (aOR = 3.90; 95% CI 1.52-10.03), having been visited by a field health worker (aOR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.01-2.64), having been exposed to family planning messages on mass media (aOR = 2.87; 95% CI 1.01-8.18) and belonging to the richest wealth quintile (aOR = 2.27; 95% CI 1.43-3.62) were associated with higher odds of contraceptive utilization. Furthermore, adolescents in the Northern (aOR = 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.80) and Luapula (aOR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.15-0.81) provinces were associated with less odds of utilizing contraceptives compared to those in Western province. In the urban areas, older age at 19 years (aOR = 4.80; 95% CI 1.55-14.84) and having a child (aOR = 18.52; 95% CI 9.50-36.14) were the only factors significantly associated with modern contraceptive utilization.

conclusionAge and having a child were associated with modern contraceptive use in both rural and urban areas. In rural areas (province, marital status, being visited by field health workers, family planning messages exposure and wealth index) were the only associated factors. This indicates that interventions aiming to increase contraceptive utilization should be context specific.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyZambiaContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35918693
PMCPMC9344606
OpenAlexW4289521979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.