Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918647›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2022

Acceptability of telephone-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) practice in a resource-limited country- a cross-sectional study.

Fareed Ahmed, Uzma Rahim Khan, Salman Muhammad Soomar, Ahmed Raheem, Rubaba Naeem, Abid Naveed, Junaid Abdul Razzak, Nadeem Ullah Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fareed AhmedDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. fareed.ahmed@aku.edu.
Uzma Rahim KhanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Salman Muhammad SoomarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahmed RaheemDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rubaba NaeemDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abid NaveedSindh Rescue & Medical Services, Karachi, Pakistan.
Junaid Abdul RazzakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nadeem Ullah KhanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PKCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT-CPR has been shown to increase bystander CPR rates dramatically and is associated with improved patient survival.

objectiveTo evaluate the acceptability of T-CPR by the bystanders and identify baseline quality measures of T-CPR in Karachi, Pakistan.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2018 at the Aman foundation command and control center. Data was collected from audiotaped phone calls of patients who required assistance from the Aman ambulance and on whom the EMS telecommunicator recognized the need for CPR and provided instructions. Information was recorded using a structured questionnaire on demographics, the status of the patient, and different time variables involved in CPR performance. A One-way ANOVA was used to compare different time variables with recommended AHA guidelines. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsThere were 481 audiotaped calls in which CPR instruction was given, listened to, and recorded data. Out of which in 459(95.4%) of cases CPR was attempted Majority of the patients were males (n = 278; 57.8%) and most had witnessed cardiac arrest (n = 470; 97.7%) at home (n = 430; 89.3%). The mean time to recognize the need for CPR by an EMS telecommunicator was 4:59 ± 1:59(min), while the mean time to start CPR instruction by a bystander was 5:28 ± 2:24(min). The mean time to start chest compression was 6:04 ± 1:52(min.).

conclusionOur results show the high acceptability of T-CPR by bystanders. We also found considerable delays in recognizing cardiac arrest and initiation of CPR by telecommunicators. Further training of telecommunicators could reduce these delays.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesHeart ArrestOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAmantadineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleTelephoneAmantadineBystanderCardiac ArrestEmergencySurvivalTelephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID35918647
PMCPMC9347158
OpenAlexW4289519189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.