ReviewBMC cardiovascular disorders2022
Prognostic implications for patients after myocardial infarction: an integrative literature review and in-depth interviews with patients and experts.
Review in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atherogenic index of plasma and the clinical outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- (Re)constructing Intersectional Masculinities Following Myocardial Infarction.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients After Myocardial Infarction: Prognostic Role of the Valsalva Maneuver.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Utilizing natriuretic peptides for predicting heart failure risk following myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
- Article
- Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Stable Patients After ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Impact of pulmonary infection and antibiotic use on recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin I for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025Article
- Applications and Prospects of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiovascular Nursing: Smart Devices, Remote Monitoring, and Personalized Care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of estimated plasma volume status at discharge in acute myocardial infarction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Mortality and Discharge Outcome in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Study Based on Korean National Hospital Discharge In-Depth Injury Survey Data.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Short-Term Prognostic Value of the Culprit-SYNTAX Score in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Timing of heart failure development and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs patients with myocardial infarction (MI) survive for a long time after acute treatment, it is necessary to pay attention to the prevention of poor prognosis such as heart failure (HF). To identify the influencing factors of adverse clinical outcomes through a review of prospective cohort studies of post-MI patients, and to draw prognostic implications through in-depth interviews with post-MI patients who progressed to HF and clinical experts.
methodsA mixed-method design was used that combined a scoping review of 21 prospective cohort studies, in-depth interviews with Korean post-MI patients with HF, and focus group interviews with cardiologists and nurses.
resultsA literature review showed that old age, diabetes, high Killip class, low left ventricular ejection fraction, recurrent MI, comorbidity of chronic disease and current smoking, and low socioeconomic status were identified as influencing factors of poor prognosis. Through interviews with post-MI patients, these influencing factors identified in the literature as well as a lack of disease awareness and lack of self-care were confirmed. Experts emphasized the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle after acute treatment with the recognition that it is a chronic disease that must go together for a lifetime.
conclusionThis study confirmed the factors influencing poor prognosis after MI and the educational needs of post-MI patients with transition to HF. Healthcare providers should continue to monitor the risk group, which is expected to have a poor prognosis, along with education emphasizing the importance of self-care such as medication and lifestyle modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.