Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918606›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2022

Chair stand test as a proxy for physical performance and muscle strength in sarcopenia diagnosis: the Korean frailty and aging cohort study.

Ji Yeon Ryu, Miji Kim, Kyoung Soo Kim, Sunyoung Kim, Chang Won Won

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sarcopenia and Tuberculosis: Is There Any Connection?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Yeon RyuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Miji KimDepartment of Biomedical Science and Technology, College of Medicine, East-West Medical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Soo KimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Sunyoung KimDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Chang Won WonDepartment of Family Medicine, Elderly Frailty Research Center, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 23, Kyung Hee Dae-ro, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea. chunwon@khmc.or.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-4461
Kyung Hee University · KR

Funding

Korea University of Technology and Education HI15C3153Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 1711138173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5-times chair stand test (5CST) is a proxy tool for measuring physical performance and muscle strength in diagnosing sarcopenia. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 guidelines recommends the 5CST for evaluating gait speed, whereas the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People guidelines recommend the chair stand test as a proxy for muscle strength.

aimsThis study sought to determine whether the chair stand test correlates with handgrip strength and gait speed, and investigate sex differences in these relationships.

methodsWe used data collected from 1416 participants (678 men and 738 women) in the 2017 Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS).

resultsThe 5CST time had a higher correlation with gait speed (r =  - 0.470) than handgrip strength (r =  - 0.309). In addition, 5CST time predicted low gait speed (area under the curve [AUC] 0.727) better than low handgrip strength (AUC 0.641). The optimal cutoff values of the 5CST to estimate low gait speed were 10 s for men (sensitivity 62%, specificity 64%) and 11 s for women (sensitivity 68%, specificity 67%). The optimal cutoff values of the 5CST for low handgrip strength were the same as those for low gait speed (10 s for men and 11 s for women).

conclusionsThe 5-times chair stand test fits with gait speed and handgrip strength but seems to be a better proxy of gait speed than handgrip strength. The optimal cutoff values of the 5CST to estimate low gait speed and low handgrip strength were lower in men than women. Although none of the AWGS 2019 or EWGSOP guidelines present sex-specific cutoffs for the 5CST, it needs to be considered in the next guidelines.

Indexed as

FrailtySarcopeniaAgedAgingCohort StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPhysical Functional PerformanceRepublic of KoreaChair stand testGait speedHandgrip strengthMuscle strengthPhysical performanceSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID35918606
OpenAlexW4289521062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.