Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918571›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

Food preference of nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus, Linnaeus, 1758) under human care.

Carolyne Assis Eigenheer Pinke Testa, Patrícia Sammarco Rosa, Thiago Ferla Novais de Castro, Maria Márcia Pereira Sartori, Alicía Giolo Hippólito, Maira Beatriz Gandolfi Silva, Priscyla Tatiana Chalfun Guimarães-Okamoto, Alessandra Melchert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolyne Assis Eigenheer Pinke TestaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Wild Animals Postgraduate, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-970, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. carolyne.pinke-testa@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-9937
Patrícia Sammarco RosaLauro de Souza Lima" Institute, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2745-2854
Thiago Ferla Novais de CastroUniversidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-5303
Maria Márcia Pereira SartoriSchool of Agriculture Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4119-8642
Alicía Giolo HippólitoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Wild Animals Postgraduate, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-970, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-9132
Maira Beatriz Gandolfi SilvaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Wild Animals Postgraduate, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-970, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-6021
Priscyla Tatiana Chalfun Guimarães-OkamotoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-970, Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-2426
Alessandra MelchertDepartment of Veterinary Clinical, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-970, Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-2121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the food preference of nine banded armadillos kept in captivity, exposed to four different diets: Diet 1 (D1) - dry dog food and ground beef; Diet 2 (D2) - dry dog food, ground beef, and chicken eggs; Diet 3 (D3) - dog food, ground beef, bananas, and papaya; Diet 4 (D4) - dog food, ground beef, chicken eggs, banana, and papaya. To this end, an experiment was carried out for five weeks, the first four of which were for preliminary management and the fifth week for data collection. Frequency of consumption, total intake for each diet, and intake ratio were evaluated. The dietary preference was higher for the diets with a higher protein percentage (D1 and D2), mainly D2, which presented increased demand and intake starting on the fourth day of observation. In second day of observation, D1 presented the higher intake ratio, but D2 gradually replaced it. The diet containing the lowest protein rate (D3) was the least favored on all observation days and evaluations. In conclusion, the food preference of ex-situ armadillos seems to be related to the inclusion of greater amounts of protein, particularly that of animal origin, with eggs being the most appreciated ingredient in this study.

Indexed as

ArmadillosFood PreferencesAnimalsCattleDogsHumansarmadilloDietary adaptationDietary behaviorFood intake

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.