ArticleScientific reports2022
Empirical facts from search for replicable associations between cortical thickness and psychometric variables in healthy adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural brain indicators of cognitive performance in middle and late adulthood: The Human Connectome Project in Aging/Aging Adult Brain Connectome cohort.Neurobiology of aging · 2026Article
- Bias in Structural MRI Correlates of Delay Discounting due to Head Motion.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Effects of cortical thickness, volume, and memory performance on age differences in neural reinstatement of scene information.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Article
- Cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and cognitive performance: a crosssectional study of the moderating effects of age on their interrelationships.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- A cross-cohort replicable and heritable latent dimension linking behaviour to multi-featured brain structure.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Relations of gray matter volume to dimensional measures of cognition and affect in mood disorders.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022Article
- Linking interindividual variability in brain structure to behaviour.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review.Scientific reports · 2020Review
- Personality and local brain structure: Their shared genetic basis and reproducibility.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- No evidence for a relationship between social closeness and similarity in resting-state functional brain connectivity in schoolchildren.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of associations between inter-individual differences in brain structure and behaviour has a long history in psychology and neuroscience. Many associations between psychometric data, particularly intelligence and personality measures and local variations of brain structure have been reported. While the impact of such reported associations often goes beyond scientific communities, resonating in the public mind, their replicability is rarely evidenced. Previously, we have shown that associations between psychometric measures and estimates of grey matter volume (GMV) result in rarely replicated findings across large samples of healthy adults. However, the question remains if these observations are at least partly linked to the multidetermined nature of the variations in GMV, particularly within samples with wide age-range. Therefore, here we extended those evaluations and empirically investigated the replicability of associations of a broad range of psychometric variables and cortical thickness in a large cohort of healthy young adults. In line with our observations with GMV, our current analyses revealed low likelihood of significant associations and their rare replication across independent samples. We here discuss the implications of these findings within the context of accumulating evidence of the general poor replicability of structural-brain-behaviour associations, and more broadly of the replication crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.