Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918394›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022

Exposure modelling in Europe: how to pave the road for the future as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030.

Urs Schlüter, Jessica Meyer, Andreas Ahrens, Francesca Borghi, Frédéric Clerc, Christiaan Delmaar, Antonio Di Guardo, Tatsiana Dudzina, Peter Fantke, Wouter Fransman and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Urs SchlüterFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1-25, D-44149, Dortmund, Germany. schlueter.urs@baua.bund.de.
Jessica MeyerFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1-25, D-44149, Dortmund, Germany.
Andreas AhrensExposure and Supply Chain Unit, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), P.O. Box 400, FI-00121, Helsinki, Finland.
Francesca BorghiDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100, Como, Italy.
Frédéric ClercNational Institute for Research and Safety (INRS), Pollutants Metrology Division, Nancy, France.
Christiaan DelmaarNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Antonio Di GuardoDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100, Como, Italy.
Tatsiana DudzinaExxon Mobil Petroleum and Chemical B.V., Hermeslaan 2, 1831, Machelen, Belgium.
Peter FantkeQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Wouter FransmanTNO, Department Risk Analysis for Products in Development, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan HahnFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM), Nikolai-Fuchs-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Henri HeussenCosanta BV, Stationsplein Noord-Oost 202, 1117 CJ, Schiphol-Oost, The Netherlands.
Christian JungGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, D-10589, Berlin, Germany.
Joonas KoivistoInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, PL 64, FI-00014, UHEL, Helsinki, Finland.
Dorothea KoppischSection 1.3 Exposure Monitoring-MGU, Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Alte Heerstr. 111, 53757, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Alicia PainiEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Nenad SavicCenter for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Route de la Corniche 2, 1066, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Andrea SpinazzèDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100, Como, Italy.
Maryam Zare JeddiNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Natalie von GoetzSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Rämistrasse 101, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. natalie.von.goetz@chem.ethz.ch.
University of Insubria · ITHenkel (Germany) · DENational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHETH Zurich · CHEuropean Chemicals AgencyFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · DEInstitut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung · DEInstitut National de Recherche et de Sécurité · FRJoint Research Centre · ITTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure models are essential in almost all relevant contexts for exposure science. To address the numerous challenges and gaps that exist, exposure modelling is one of the priority areas of the European Exposure Science Strategy developed by the European Chapter of the International Society of Exposure Science (ISES Europe). A strategy was developed for the priority area of exposure modelling in Europe with four strategic objectives. These objectives are (1) improvement of models and tools, (2) development of new methodologies and support for understudied fields, (3) improvement of model use and (4) regulatory needs for modelling. In a bottom-up approach, exposure modellers from different European countries and institutions who are active in the fields of occupational, population and environmental exposure science pooled their expertise under the umbrella of the ISES Europe Working Group on exposure models. This working group assessed the state-of-the-art of exposure modelling in Europe by developing an inventory of exposure models used in Europe and reviewing the existing literature on pitfalls for exposure modelling, in order to identify crucial modelling-related strategy elements. Decisive actions were defined for ISES Europe stakeholders, including collecting available models and accompanying information in a living document curated and published by ISES Europe, as well as a long-term goal of developing a best-practices handbook. Alongside these actions, recommendations were developed and addressed to stakeholders outside of ISES Europe. Four strategic objectives were identified with an associated action plan and roadmap for the implementation of the European Exposure Science Strategy for exposure modelling. This strategic plan will foster a common understanding of modelling-related methodology, terminology and future research in Europe, and have a broader impact on strategic considerations globally.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureEuropeHumansEuropean Exposure Science StrategyExposure modelsISES Europe

Identifiers

PMID35918394
PMCPMC9349043
OpenAlexW4289523002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.