Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918351›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

A dataset of mentorship in bioscience with semantic and demographic estimations.

Qing Ke, Lizhen Liang, Ying Ding, Stephen V David, Daniel E Acuna

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gender and racial diversity socialization in science.Nature computational science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The academic Great Gatsby Curve.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qing KeSchool of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. q.ke@cityu.edu.hk.
Lizhen LiangSchool of Information Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 13244, USA.
Ying DingSchool of Information, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712, USA.
Stephen V DavidOregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-3104
Daniel E AcunaSchool of Information Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 13244, USA. deacuna@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-1595

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1933803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentorship in science is crucial for topic choice, career decisions, and the success of mentees and mentors. Typically, researchers who study mentorship use article co-authorship and doctoral dissertation datasets. However, available datasets of this type focus on narrow selections of fields and miss out on early career and non-publication-related interactions. Here, we describe Mentorship, a crowdsourced dataset of 743176 mentorship relationships among 738989 scientists primarily in biosciences that avoids these shortcomings. Our dataset enriches the Academic Family Tree project by adding publication data from the Microsoft Academic Graph and "semantic" representations of research using deep learning content analysis. Because gender and race have become critical dimensions when analyzing mentorship and disparities in science, we also provide estimations of these factors. We perform extensive validations of the profile-publication matching, semantic content, and demographic inferences, which mostly cover neuroscience and biomedical sciences. We anticipate this dataset will spur the study of mentorship in science and deepen our understanding of its role in scientists' career outcomes.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesMentorsResearch PersonnelDemographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID35918351
PMCPMC9345966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.