ReviewEuropean urology focus2022
Optimal Selection of Patients with Genitourinary Cancers for Anti-PD1/PD-L1 Treatment with a Focus on Urothelial and Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Review in European urology focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prognostic Role of Interferon Gamma-inducible Protein 30 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with Immune Infiltrates.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2026Article
- The Role of Tumor and Host Microbiome on Immunotherapy Response in Urologic Cancers.Journal of cancer immunology · 2024Article
- Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions.Clinical & translational immunology · 2023Article
- Impact of Bone Metastases on Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma or Melanoma Treated with Combotherapy Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab.Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the recent approval of numerous immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of genitourinary tumors, predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Different approaches are necessary, as the only approved biomarker for urothelial carcinoma (UC), namely PD-L1 immunostaining, has questionable predictive value. By contrast, tumor-infiltrating cells have been associated with therapy response in both UC and renal cell carcinoma. Tumor-derived gene signatures can further identify patients with pre-existing adaptive immunity. Whereas tumor mutation burden, DNA repair defects, and microsatellite instability are of some predictive value, the utility of single gene mutations has not yet been proved. As ICIs mainly target tumor metastases, analysis of primary tumors appears to be suboptimal. Circulating biomarkers reflecting tumor and systemic alterations in a more complex and dynamic manner are of great potential. The most promising approach is an analysis of complex tumor composition with concomitant consideration of the host immune status, which is also influenced by the gut microbiome. PATIENT SUMMARY: Immunotherapy is one of the treatment options for cancers of the urinary tract and kidney. We review the methods for measuring biomarkers that may predict which patients are most likely to respond to this treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.