Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918142›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

Fusion Mass Screws in Revision Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Simple and Safe Alternative Fixation.

Ashish Mittal, Alexander Rosinski, Khalid Odeh, Cristian Balcescu, Victor Ungurean, Victor Ungurean, Dimitriy G Kondrashov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish MittalSt. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alexander RosinskiSt. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Khalid OdehSt. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cristian BalcescuSt. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Victor UngureanThe Taylor Collaboration, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Victor UngureanInstitute of Emergency Medicine, Chisinau, Moldova.
Dimitriy G KondrashovSt. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program, San Francisco, CA, USA sfspine@gmail.com.
St. Mary's Medical Center · USTaylor University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRevision spinal deformity surgery has a high rate of complications. Fixation may be challenging due to altered anatomy. Screws through a fusion mass are an alternative to pedicle screw fixation.

objectiveThe purpose of this retrospective study was to further elucidate the safety and efficacy of fusion mass screws (FMSs) in revision spinal deformity surgery.

designRetrospective case series.

methodsFifteen freehand FMSs were placed in 6 patients with adult spinal deformity between 2016 and 2018 by the senior author. FMSs were combined with pedicle screws, at times at the same level. FMSs were used to save distal levels from fusion, assist in closing a 3-column osteotomy and provide additional fixation in cases of severe instability. Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and thickness of each fusion mass preoperatively along with accuracy of FMS placement postoperatively.

resultsThe mean BMD of the fusion mass was 397 Hounsfield units (HU; range: 156-628 HU). The mean AP thickness of the fusion mass was 15.5 ± 4.8 mm (range: 8.6-24.4 mm). The mean FMS length was 35.3 ± 5.5 mm (range: 25-40 mm). There was no evidence of FMS loosening, breakage, or pseudarthrosis at latest follow-up (mean: 2.2 years, range: 1.4-3.1 years). No neurologic deficits were observed. 1/15 screws had a low-grade breach into the canal (<2 mm). No patients required revision surgery.

conclusionFMSs may be used to augment fixation in revision spinal deformity cases when pedicle screw placement may be challenging. FMSs may also provide an additional anchor at levels with pedicular fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

extrapedicular fixationfusion masspedicular dysplasiarevisionspinal deformity

Identifiers

PMID35918142
PMCPMC10025832
OpenAlexW4289518240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.