ArticleSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2022
The pediatric glucocorticoid toxicity index.
Article in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07719140 (Low- Versus High-Dose Initial Glucocorticoid Therapy for Childhood-Onset Proliferative Lupus Nephritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Low- Versus High-Dose Initial Glucocorticoid Therapy for Childhood-Onset Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: a Multicenter Open-Label Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitating Expedited Drug Approval-the Past, Present, and Future of Clinical Trials for Pediatric Rheumatic Disease.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy Practices Between Pediatric and Adult Rheumatologists: A Multicenter Survey Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Establishing core outcomes and minimal clinically important differences for childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome clinical trials: results from a Delphi consensus process.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Rethinking Corticosteroid Therapy in Pediatric Neurology.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of rheumatic drugs and their indications in paediatric and adolescent care.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Article
- Validation of childhood lupus specific targets: ensuring accurate assessment of disease control in younger, lighter paediatric patients.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Real-world application of the pediatric Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index in childhood-onset lupus.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2024Article
- Defining remission in childhood-onset lupus: PReS-endorsed consensus definitions by an international task force.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Genetic, serological and clinical evaluation of childhood myasthenia syndromes- single center subgroup analysis experience in Turkey.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Article
- Paediatric glucocorticoid toxicity index: new possibilities in assessment.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a Pediatric glucocorticoid toxicity index (pGTI), a standardized, weighted clinical outcome assessment that measures change in glucocorticoid (GC) toxicity over time.
methodsFourteen physician experts from 7 subspecialties participated. The physician experts represented multiple subspecialties in which GCs play a major role in the treatment of inflammatory disease: nephrology, rheumatology, oncology, endocrinology, genetics, psychiatry, and maternal-fetal medicine. Nine investigators were from Canada, Europe, or New Zealand, and 5 were from the United States. Group consensus methods and multi-criteria decision analysis were used. The pGTI is an aggregate assessment of GC toxicities that are common, important, and dynamic. These toxicities are organized into health domains graded as minor, moderate, or major and are weighted according to severity. The relative weights were derived by group consensus and multi-criteria decision analysis using the 1000Minds
resultsOne hundred and seven (107) toxicity items were included in the pGTI and thirty-two (32) in the Damage Checklist. To assess the degree to which the pGTI corresponds to expert clinical judgement, the investigators ranked 15 cases by clinical judgement from highest to lowest GC toxicity. Expert rankings were then compared to case ranking by the pGTI, yielding excellent agreement (weighted kappa 0.86). The pGTI was migrated to a digital environment following its development and initial validation. The digital platform is designed to ensure ease-of-use in the clinic, rigor in application, and accuracy of scoring. Clinic staff enter vital signs, laboratory results, and medication changes relevant to pGTI scoring. Clinicians record findings for GC myopathy, skin toxicity, mood dysfunction, and infection. The pGTI algorithms then apply the weights to these raw data and calculate scores. Embedded logic accounts for the impact of age- and sex-related reference ranges on several health domains: blood pressure, lipid metabolism, and bone mineral density. Other algorithms account for anticipated changes in the height Z-scores used in the growth domain, thereby addressing a concern unique to GC toxicity in children. The Damage Checklist ensures comprehensive measurement of GC toxicity but does not contribute to pGTI scoring, because the scored domains emphasize manifestations of GC toxicity that are likely to change over the course of a trial.
conclusionsWe describe the development and initial evaluation of a weighted, composite toxicity index for the assessment of morbidity related to GC use in children and adolescents. Developing the pGTI digital platform was essential for performing the nuanced calculations necessary to ensure rigor, accuracy, and ease-of-use in both clinic and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.