ArticlePloS one2022
A lightweight deep neural network with higher accuracy.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve accuracy of the MobileNet network, a new lightweight deep neural network is designed based on the MobileNetV2 network. Firstly, it modifies the network depth of MobileNetV2 to balance the image resolution, network width and depth to keep the gradient stable, which reduces the generation of gradient vanishing or gradient exploding. Secondly, it proposes an improved Bottleneck module by introducing channel attention mechanism. It assigns different weights for different channels according to the degree of relevance between the object features and channels. Therefore, the network can extract more effective features from a complex background. In the end, a new usage strategy of the improved Bottleneck is proposed. It uses the improved Bottleneck module in the second, fourth and fifth stages of MobileNetV2, and uses the original Bottleneck module in other states. Compared with MobileNetV2, MobileNetV3, ShuffleNetV2, GhostNet and HBONetmethods, the proposed method has the highest classification accuracy on the ImageNet-1K dataset, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Compared with YOLOV4-Lite methods based on these lightweight network networks, YOLOV4-Lite based on our proposed network also has the highest detection accuracy on the PASCAL VOC07+12 dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.