Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35917287›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2023

Preventing Falls Among Older Adults in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.

Yvonne A Johnston, Chelsea Reome-Nedlik, Erin M Parker, Gwen Bergen, Leah Wentworth, Michael Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Implementation science in care for older adults across healthcare settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yvonne A JohnstonDivision of Public Health, Decker College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Chelsea Reome-NedlikBroome County Health Department, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Erin M ParkerUS Public Health Service, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,USA.
Gwen BergenNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,USA.
Leah WentworthNational Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Michael BauerNew York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Albany, New York, USA.

Funding

Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP)U17CE001997 · CE · NYSDOH/HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI BAUER, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCIPC CDC HHS U17 CE001997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesFalls are a leading cause of injuries and injury deaths for older adults. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) initiative, a multifactorial approach to fall prevention, was adapted for implementation within the primary care setting of a health system in upstate New York. The purpose of this article is to: (a) report process evaluation results for this implementation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and (b) examine the utility of RE-AIM for assessing barriers and facilitators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis evaluation used mixed methods. Qualitative evaluation involved semistructured interviews with key stakeholders and intercept interviews with health care providers and clinic staff. Quantitative methods utilized surveys with clinic staff. Process evaluation tools were developed based on the AIM dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. The study was conducted over a 2-month period, approximately 18 months postimplementation, and complements previously published results of the program's reach and effectiveness.

resultsPrimary barriers by RE-AIM construct included competing organizational priorities (Adoption), competing patient care demands (Implementation), and staff turnover (Maintenance). Primary facilitators included having a physician champion (Adoption), preparing and training staff (Implementation), and communicating about STEADI and recognizing accomplishments (Maintenance). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Results revealed a high degree of concordance between qualitative and quantitative analyses. The framework supported assessments of various stakeholders, multiple organizational levels, and the sequence of practice change activities. Mixed methods yielded rich data to inform future implementations of STEADI-based fall prevention.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPhysiciansAgedHumansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalysis―mixed methodsBarriers and facilitatorsEvaluationFallsSTEADI

Identifiers

PMID35917287
PMCPMC10258889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.