Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35917122›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Comparison of Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Breast Cancer and Short-term Outcomes Before vs During the COVID-19 Era in Ontario, Canada.

Steven Habbous, Xiaochen Tai, Jaclyn M Beca, Jessica Arias, Michael J Raphael, Ambica Parmar, Andrea Crespo, Matthew C Cheung, Andrea Eisen, Antoine Eskander and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Steven HabbousOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Xiaochen TaiOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jaclyn M BecaOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica AriasOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael J RaphaelCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ambica ParmarDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CrespoOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew C CheungHematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea EisenOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antoine EskanderDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simron SinghDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maureen TrudeauDivision of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scott GavuraOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wei Fang DaiOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan IrishOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monika KrzyzanowskaOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren Lapointe-ShawInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rohini NaipaulOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stuart PeacockCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lyndee YeungOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leta ForbesOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cancer Care Ontario · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In response to an increase in COVID-19 infection rates in Ontario, several systemic treatment (ST) regimens delivered in the adjuvant setting for breast cancer were temporarily permitted for neoadjuvant-intent to defer nonurgent breast cancer surgical procedures. Objective: To examine the use and compare short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant-intent vs adjuvant ST in the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Patients with cancer starting selected ST regimens in the COVID-19 era (March 11, 2020, to September 30, 2020) were compared to those in the pre-COVID-19 era (March 11, 2019, to March 10, 2020). Patients were diagnosed with breast cancer within 6 months of starting systemic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimates were calculated for the use of neoadjuvant vs adjuvant ST, the likelihood of receiving a surgical procedure, the rate of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, COVID-19 infections, and all-cause mortality between treatment groups over time. Results: Among a total of 10 920 patients included, 7990 (73.2%) started treatment in the pre-COVID-19 era and 7344 (67.3%) received adjuvant ST; the mean (SD) age was 61.6 (13.1) years. Neoadjuvant-intent ST was more common in the COVID-19 era (1404 of 2930 patients [47.9%]) than the pre-COVID-19 era (2172 of 7990 patients [27.2%]), with an odds ratio of 2.46 (95% CI, 2.26-2.69; P < .001). This trend was consistent across a range of ST regimens, but differed according to patient age and geography. The likelihood of receiving surgery following neoadjuvant-intent chemotherapy was similar in the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era (log-rank P = .06). However, patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant-intent hormonal therapy were significantly more likely to receive surgery in the COVID-19 era (log-rank P < .001). After adjustment, there were no significant changes in the rate of emergency department visits over time between patients receiving neoadjuvant ST, adjuvant ST, or ST only during the ST treatment period or postoperative period. Hospital admissions decreased in the COVID-19 era for patients who received neoadjuvant ST compared with adjuvant ST or ST alone (P for interaction = .01 for both) in either setting. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients were more likely to start neoadjuvant ST in the COVID-19 era, which varied across the province and by indication. There was limited evidence to suggest any substantial impact on short-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19Chemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOntarioRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35917122
PMCPMC9346546
OpenAlexW4289443186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.