Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916995›Full record

ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2022

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Iran.

Nasrin Sargazi, Amirhossein Takian, Rajabali Daroudi, Azin Nahvijou, Mehdi Yaseri, Ali Ghanbari Motlagh, Kazem Zendehdel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Is next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases worth its cost? A user-based approach to valuation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comprehensive National Strategy for HPV Prevention and Treatment in Iran.International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nasrin SargaziDepartment of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein TakianDepartment of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. takian@tums.ac.ir.
Rajabali DaroudiDepartment of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Azin NahvijouCancer Research Center of Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi YaseriDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Ali Ghanbari MotlaghCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kazem ZendehdelCancer Research Center of Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing global attention to the national human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization program, this program is controversial in Iran. Evidence indicates that HPV vaccination is not cost-effective in Iran. Using cost-effectiveness analysis for decision-making about public health interventions such as vaccination is controversial because its potential benefits may not fit this framework. This study aimed to evaluate the economic effects of the HPV vaccination by cost-benefit analysis (CBA) using bivalent and quadrivalent in Iran in 2020. We performed a CBA from a societal perspective. We used two approaches of the vaccine's economic benefits: willingness to pay by discrete choice experiment and cost of illness. Costs only included the vaccine cost. The cost of two doses of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines were US $29 and the US $151, respectively (US $1 = IRR 42,000). The benefits of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines were US $ - 432, US $380 per person using the willingness to pay approach, and they were US $7375 and US $6590 thorough cost-of-illness approach. The cost-benefit ratio (CBR) of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines was - 15.11 and 2.51 by the willingness to pay approach, and 258.12 and 43.51 by the cost of illness approach. This study confirms the benefits of the national bivalent and quadrivalent vaccination programs and provides reliable evidence for policy-makers programming HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansIranVaccines, CombinedPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccines, CombinedCost–benefit analysisCost-of-illnessDiscrete choice experimentHPVIranVaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.