Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916971›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2022

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of cystic ovarian tumors: major differential diagnoses in five types frequently encountered in daily clinical practice.

Ayumi Ohya, Yasunari Fujinaga

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MRI-based morphology of ovarian clear cell carcinomas.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of MR Imaging of High-grade Serous Carcinomas with and without Homologous Recombination-deficiency.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pictorial review of bilateral adnexal lesions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayumi OhyaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan. ayumiayu@shinshu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-7531
Yasunari FujinagaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
Shinshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many types of ovarian tumors, and these different types often form cystic masses with a similar appearance, which can make their differentiation difficult. However, with the exclusion of rare ovarian tumors, the number of ovarian tumors encountered in daily practice is somewhat fixed. It goes without saying that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for differentiating ovarian tumors. In this review, we summarize the differential diagnoses for each of the five types of MRI findings commonly encountered in daily practice. First, unilocular cystic masses without mural nodules/solid components include benign lesions such as serous cystadenoma, functional cysts, surface epithelial inclusion cysts, paratubal cysts, and endometriosis. Second, multilocular cystic ovarian lesions include mucinous tumors and ovarian metastases. It should be noted that mucinous tumors may be diagnosed as borderline or carcinoma, even if no solid component is observed. Third, cystic lesions with mural nodules that are unrelated to endometriosis include serous borderline tumor and serous carcinoma. Cystic lesions with solid components are more likely to be malignant, but some may be diagnosed as benign. Fourth, ovarian tumors deriving from endometriosis include seromucinous borderline tumors, endometrioid carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma. These tumors sometimes need to be differentiated from serous tumors. Finally, cystic lesions with lipid contents include teratoma-related tumors. In mature cystic teratoma, mural nodules (called "Rokitansky protuberance" or "dermoid nipple") are sometimes seen, but they do not suggest malignancy. Some of these lesions can be diagnosed accurately by considering their characteristic imaging findings, their changes over time, MRI findings other than those of the primary lesion, and information from other modalities such as tumor markers. To ensure the optimal treatment for ovarian tumors, it is important to estimate the histological type as well as to diagnose whether a lesion is benign or malignant.

Indexed as

CarcinomaEndometriosisNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian CystsOvarian NeoplasmsTeratomaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCystic ovarian tumorDifferential diagnosisMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35916971
PMCPMC9719891
OpenAlexW4289523414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.