Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916952›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites.

Natália Gomes de Oliveira, Luís Felipe Espíndola-Castro, Julliana Carvalho Rocha, Amanda Pinheiro de Barros Albuquerque, Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo Rêgo, Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro, Marianne de Vasconcelos Carvalho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composites-Are We Going Somewhere?Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natália Gomes de OliveiraDental School, University of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE), Avenida Professor Luís Freire, 700, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50740-540, Brazil. nataliagomes04@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-1537
Luís Felipe Espíndola-CastroDental School, University of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE), Avenida Professor Luís Freire, 700, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50740-540, Brazil.
Julliana Carvalho RochaDental School, University of Pernambuco (Campus Arcoverde), Estrada Para Sítio Deserto, Arcoverde, PE, 1940, Brazil.
Amanda Pinheiro de Barros AlbuquerqueBiochemistry Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo RêgoBiochemistry Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Gabriela Queiroz de Melo MonteiroDental School, University of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE), Avenida Professor Luís Freire, 700, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50740-540, Brazil.
Marianne de Vasconcelos CarvalhoDental School, University of Pernambuco (FOP/UPE), Avenida Professor Luís Freire, 700, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50740-540, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05).

resultsDF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/mm

conclusionsThe SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical-chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical-chemical stability should be considered.

Indexed as

CoffeeComposite ResinsAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsColorHardnessMaterials TestingSolubilityVero CellsCoffeeComposite ResinsBulk-fill resin compositeCytotoxicityHardnessResin compositeSelf-adhering resin compositeSolubilitySorption

Identifiers

PMID35916952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.