Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916848›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2022

Effect of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining on Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matthew K Bagg, Benedict M Wand, Aidan G Cashin, Hopin Lee, Markus Hübscher, Tasha R Stanton, Neil E O'Connell, Edel T O'Hagan, Rodrigo R N Rizzo, Michael A Wewege and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthew K BaggCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Benedict M WandFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia.
Aidan G CashinCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Hopin LeeCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Markus HübscherCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Tasha R StantonIIMPACT (Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
Neil E O'ConnellDepartment of Health Sciences, Centre for Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Edel T O'HaganCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Rodrigo R N RizzoCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Michael A WewegeCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Martin RabeyCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen GoodallCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sopany SaingCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Serigne N LoMelanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hannu LuomajokiSchool of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Robert D HerbertNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Chris G MaherSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
G Lorimer MoseleyIIMPACT (Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
James H McAuleyCentre for Pain IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain to Advance Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Neuroscience Research Australia · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUBrunel University of London · GBCurtin University · AUImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effects of altered neural processing, defined as altering neural networks responsible for perceptions of pain and function, on chronic pain remains unclear. Objective: To estimate the effect of a graded sensorimotor retraining intervention (RESOLVE) on pain intensity in people with chronic low back pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel, 2-group, randomized clinical trial recruited participants with chronic (>3 months) nonspecific low back pain from primary care and community settings. A total of 276 adults were randomized (in a 1:1 ratio) to the intervention or sham procedure and attention control groups delivered by clinicians at a medical research institute in Sydney, Australia. The first participant was randomized on December 10, 2015, and the last was randomized on July 25, 2019. Follow-up was completed on February 3, 2020. Interventions: Participants randomized to the intervention group (n = 138) were asked to participate in 12 weekly clinical sessions and home training designed to educate them about and assist them with movement and physical activity while experiencing lower back pain. Participants randomized to the control group (n = 138) were asked to participate in 12 weekly clinical sessions and home training that required similar time as the intervention but did not focus on education, movement, and physical activity. The control group included sham laser and shortwave diathermy applied to the back and sham noninvasive brain stimulation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity at 18 weeks, measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for which the between-group minimum clinically important difference is 1.0 point. Results: Among 276 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 46 [14.3] years; 138 [50%] women), 261 (95%) completed follow-up at 18 weeks. The mean pain intensity was 5.6 at baseline and 3.1 at 18 weeks in the intervention group and 5.8 at baseline and 4.0 at 18 weeks in the control group, with an estimated between-group mean difference at 18 weeks of -1.0 point ([95% CI, -1.5 to -0.4]; P = .001), favoring the intervention group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial conducted at a single center among patients with chronic low back pain, graded sensorimotor retraining, compared with a sham procedure and attention control, significantly improved pain intensity at 18 weeks. The improvements in pain intensity were small, and further research is needed to understand the generalizability of the findings. Trial Registration: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12615000610538.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainPain ManagementPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSomatosensory DisordersAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceNeurological RehabilitationPain MeasurementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35916848
PMCPMC9346551
OpenAlexW4289443324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.