Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916709›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation Using Machine Learning With Wearable Devices After Cardiac Surgery: Algorithm Development Study.

Daisuke Hiraoka, Tomohiko Inui, Eiryo Kawakami, Megumi Oya, Ayumu Tsuji, Koya Honma, Yohei Kawasaki, Yoshihito Ozawa, Yuki Shiko, Hideki Ueda and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke HiraokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-7195
Tomohiko InuiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-4837
Eiryo KawakamiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-4342
Megumi OyaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-2541
Ayumu TsujiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6450-8223
Koya HonmaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-6635
Yohei KawasakiClinical Research Center, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-7647
Yoshihito OzawaClinical Research Center, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-8932
Yuki ShikoClinical Research Center, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-9343
Hideki UedaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-8515
Hiroki KohnoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5779-9920
Kaoru MatsuuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-4482
Michiko WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-7526
Yasunori YakitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-0497
Goro MatsumiyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-4607
Chiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome attempts have been made to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) with a wearable device equipped with photoelectric volumetric pulse wave technology, and it is expected to be applied under real clinical conditions.

objectiveThis study is the second part of a 2-phase study aimed at developing a method for immediate detection of paroxysmal AF, using a wearable device with built-in photoplethysmography (PPG). The objective of this study is to develop an algorithm to immediately diagnose AF by an Apple Watch equipped with a PPG sensor that is worn by patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to use machine learning on the pulse data output from the device.

methodsA total of 80 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single institution between June 2020 and March 2021 were monitored for postoperative AF, using a telemetry-monitored electrocardiogram (ECG) and an Apple Watch. AF was diagnosed by qualified physicians from telemetry-monitored ECGs and 12-lead ECGs; a diagnostic algorithm was developed using machine learning on the pulse rate data output from the Apple Watch.

resultsOne of the 80 patients was excluded from the analysis due to redness caused by wearing the Apple Watch. Of 79 patients, 27 (34.2%) developed AF, and 199 events of AF including brief AF were observed. Of them, 18 events of AF lasting longer than 1 hour were observed, and cross-correlation analysis showed that pulse rate measured by Apple Watch was strongly correlated (cross-correlation functions [CCF]: 0.6-0.8) with 8 events and very strongly correlated (CCF>0.8) with 3 events. The diagnostic accuracy by machine learning was 0.9416 (sensitivity 0.909 and specificity 0.838 at the point closest to the top left) for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

conclusionsWe were able to safely monitor pulse rate in patients who wore an Apple Watch after cardiac surgery. Although the pulse rate measured by the PPG sensor does not follow the heart rate recorded by telemetry-monitored ECGs in some parts, which may reduce the accuracy of AF diagnosis by machine learning, we have shown the possibility of clinical application of using only the pulse rate collected by the PPG sensor for the early detection of AF.

Indexed as

algorithmApple Watchatrial fibrillationcardiac surgerycardiologydetectiondevelopmentdiagnoseheartmachine learningmHealthmobile healthphotoplethysmographypilot studypulsesensorwearable device

Identifiers

PMID35916709
PMCPMC9379796
OpenAlexW4285324645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.