Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916693›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Just-in-Time Prompts for Running, Walking, and Performing Strength Exercises in the Built Environment: 4-Week Randomized Feasibility Study.

Karlijn Sporrel, Shihan Wang, Dick D F Ettema, Nicky Nibbeling, Ben J A Krose, Marije Deutekom, Rémi D D de Boer, Monique Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karlijn SporrelHuman Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8553
Shihan WangDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-7522
Dick D F EttemaHuman Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-5510
Nicky NibbelingFaculty of Sports and Nutrition, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-2349
Ben J A KroseInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-0618
Marije DeutekomDepartment of Health, Sports and Welfare, Inholland University, Haarlem, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-5204
Rémi D D de BoerDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-4290
Monique SimonsConsumption and Healthy Lifestyles group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-4616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApp-based mobile health exercise interventions can motivate individuals to engage in more physical activity (PA). According to the Fogg Behavior Model, it is important that the individual receive prompts at the right time to be successfully persuaded into PA. These are referred to as just-in-time (JIT) interventions. The Playful Active Urban Living (PAUL) app is among the first to include 2 types of JIT prompts: JIT adaptive reminder messages to initiate a run or walk and JIT strength exercise prompts during a walk or run (containing location-based instruction videos). This paper reports on the feasibility of the PAUL app and its JIT prompts.

objectiveThe main objective of this study was to examine user experience, app engagement, and users' perceptions and opinions regarding the PAUL app and its JIT prompts and to explore changes in the PA behavior, intrinsic motivation, and the perceived capability of the PA behavior of the participants.

methodsIn total, 2 versions of the closed-beta version of the PAUL app were evaluated: a basic version (Basic PAUL) and a JIT adaptive version (Smart PAUL). Both apps send JIT exercise prompts, but the versions differ in that the Smart PAUL app sends JIT adaptive reminder messages to initiate running or walking behavior, whereas the Basic PAUL app sends reminder messages at randomized times. A total of 23 participants were randomized into 1 of the 2 intervention arms. PA behavior (accelerometer-measured), intrinsic motivation, and the perceived capability of PA behavior were measured before and after the intervention. After the intervention, participants were also asked to complete a questionnaire on user experience, and they were invited for an exit interview to assess user perceptions and opinions of the app in depth.

resultsNo differences in PA behavior were observed (Z=-1.433; P=.08), but intrinsic motivation for running and walking and for performing strength exercises significantly increased (Z=-3.342; P<.001 and Z=-1.821; P=.04, respectively). Furthermore, participants increased their perceived capability to perform strength exercises (Z=2.231; P=.01) but not to walk or run (Z=-1.221; P=.12). The interviews indicated that the participants were enthusiastic about the strength exercise prompts. These were perceived as personal, fun, and relevant to their health. The reminders were perceived as important initiators for PA, but participants from both app groups explained that the reminder messages were often not sent at times they could exercise. Although the participants were enthusiastic about the functionalities of the app, technical issues resulted in a low user experience.

conclusionsThe preliminary findings suggest that the PAUL apps are promising and innovative interventions for promoting PA. Users perceived the strength exercise prompts as a valuable addition to exercise apps. However, to be a feasible intervention, the app must be more stable.

Indexed as

context-basedengagementexercise applicationfeasibility studyFogg Behavior Modeljust-in-time interventionsmHealthmobile healthmobile phonephysical activitypromptsremindersuser experience

Identifiers

PMID35916693
PMCPMC9379785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.