Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916691›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Integrating Top-down and Bottom-up Requirements in eHealth Development: The Case of a Mobile Self-compassion Intervention for People With Newly Diagnosed Cancer.

Judith Austin, Constance H C Drossaert, Jelle van Dijk, Robbert Sanderman, Elin Børøsund, Jelena Mirkovic, Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra, Nienke J Peeters, Jan-Willem J R Van 't Klooster, Maya J Schroevers and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07415629 (Evaluation of a Self-compassion App in People With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07415629 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Self-compassion App in People With Cancer: Feasibility, Acceptability and Changes in Well-being

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2024 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsCancerArmsA digital self-help self-compassion app intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimizing the impact of supportive cancer care digital health interventions: considerations for design, development, and evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  11. CAPO and CANO joining forces to advance a national psychosocial oncology advocacy agenda.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Judith AustinSection of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-7558
Constance H C DrossaertSection of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-3169
Jelle van DijkFaculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-3302
Robbert SandermanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-1159
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-7055
Jelena MirkovicDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-1230
Marijke Schotanus-DijkstraSection of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-5599
Nienke J PeetersSection of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-980X
Jan-Willem J R Van 't KloosterBehavioural Management and Social Sciences Lab, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-2792
Maya J SchroeversDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8518-9153
Ernst T BohlmeijerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-1245
University of Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial eHealth interventions for people with cancer are promising in reducing distress; however, their results in terms of effects and adherence rates are quite mixed. Developing interventions with a solid evidence base while still ensuring adaptation to user wishes and needs is recommended to overcome this. As most models of eHealth development are based primarily on examining user experiences (so-called bottom-up requirements), it is not clear how theory and evidence (so-called top-down requirements) may best be integrated into the development process.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements in the co-design of eHealth applications by building on the development of a mobile self-compassion intervention for people with newly diagnosed cancer.

methodsFour co-design tasks were formulated at the start of the project and adjusted and evaluated throughout: explore bottom-up experiences, reassess top-down content, incorporate bottom-up and top-down input into concrete features and design, and synergize bottom-up and top-down input into the intervention context. These tasks were executed iteratively during a series of co-design sessions over the course of 2 years, in which 15 people with cancer and 7 nurses (recruited from 2 hospitals) participated. On the basis of the sessions, a list of requirements, a final intervention design, and an evaluation of the co-design process and tasks were yielded.

resultsThe final list of requirements included intervention content (eg, major topics of compassionate mind training such as psychoeducation about 3 emotion systems and main issues that people with cancer encounter after diagnosis such as regulating information consumption), navigation, visual design, implementation strategies, and persuasive elements. The final intervention, Compas-Y, is a mobile self-compassion training comprising 6 training modules and several supportive functionalities such as a mood tracker and persuasive elements such as push notifications. The 4 co-design tasks helped overcome challenges in the development process such as dealing with conflicting top-down and bottom-up requirements and enabled the integration of all main requirements into the design.

conclusionsThis study addressed the necessary integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements into eHealth development by examining a preliminary model of 4 co-design tasks. Broader considerations regarding the design of a mobile intervention based on traditional intervention formats and merging the scientific disciplines of psychology and design research are discussed.

Indexed as

cancerco-designeHealthevidence-basedmobile phonerequirementsself-compassion

Identifiers

PMID35916691
PMCPMC9379787
OpenAlexW4289307911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.