Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916629›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022

An in vitro and ex vivo wound infection model to test topical and systemic treatment with antibiotics.

Yanyan Cheng, Paul A De Bank, Albert Bolhuis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Simulated Media for Mimicking the Human Environment In Vitro.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanyan ChengDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and the Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Paul A De BankDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and the Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Albert BolhuisDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and the Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-0515
University of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to develop a wound infection model that could be used to test antibiotic-loaded electrospun matrices for the topical treatment of infected skin and compare the effectiveness of this treatment to systemically applied antibiotics. METHODS AND

results3D-printed flow chambers were made in which Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were grown either on a polycarbonate membrane or explanted porcine skin. The biofilms were then treated either topically, by placing antibiotic-loaded electrospun matrices on top of the biofilms, or systemically by the addition of antibiotics in the growth medium that flowed underneath the membrane or skin. The medium that was used was either a rich medium or an artificial wound fluid. The results showed that microbial viability in the biofilms was reduced to a greater extent with the topical electrospun matrices when compared to systemic treatment.

conclusionsAn ex vivo infection model was developed that is flexible and can be used to test both topical and systemic treatment of wound infections. It represents a significant improvement over previous in vitro models that we have used to test electrospun membranes. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The availability of a relatively simple wound infection model in which different delivery methods and dosage regimes can be tested is beneficial for the development of improved treatments for wound infections.

Indexed as

Staphylococcal InfectionsWound InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsStaphylococcus aureusSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsantibioticselectrospinningStaphylococcus aureuswound dressingwound infection model

Identifiers

PMID35916629
PMCPMC9804477
OpenAlexW4289524096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.