Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916528›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2022

How Escherichia coli Became the Flagship Bacterium of Molecular Biology.

Natividad Ruiz, Thomas J Silhavy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High-level production of vitamin K2 inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Characterisation of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Functional Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natividad RuizDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6369-2206
Thomas J SilhavyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton Universitygrid.16750.35, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7672-5153

Funding

Biogenesis and maintenance of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteriaR35GM118024 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SILHAVY, THOMAS J. · 2016 to 2025
$8.1M
Envelope Biogenesis in Gram-negative BacteriaR01GM100951 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUIZ, NATIVIDAD · 2012 to 2023
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100951NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli is likely the most studied organism and was instrumental in developing many fundamental concepts in biology. But why E. coli? In the 1940s, E. coli was well suited for the biochemical and genetic research that blended to become the seminal field of biochemical genetics and led to the realization that processes already known to occur in complex organisms were conserved in bacteria. This now-obvious concept, combined with the advantages offered by its easy cultivation, ultimately drove many researchers to shift from the complexity of eukaryotic models to the simpler bacterial system, which eventually led to the development of molecular biology. As knowledge and experimental tools amassed, a positive-feedback loop fixed the central role of E. coli in research. However, given the vast diversity among bacteria and even among E. coli strains, it was by many fortuitous events that E. coli rose to the top as an experimental model. Here, we share how serendipity and its own biology selected E. coli as the flagship bacterium of molecular biology.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsBacteriaEukaryotaHumansMolecular BiologyEscherichia coligeneticshistoryK-12 strainsmolecular biology

Identifiers

PMID35916528
PMCPMC9487582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.