Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35916351›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2022

Quality of life in patients with heart failure and improved ejection fraction: one-year changes and prognosis.

Elisabet Zamora, Beatriz González, Josep Lupón, Andrea Borrellas, Mar Domingo, Evelyn Santiago-Vacas, Germán Cediel, Pau Codina, Carmen Rivas, Ana Pulido and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabet ZamoraHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Beatriz GonzálezHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep LupónHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea BorrellasHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Mar DomingoHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Evelyn Santiago-VacasHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Germán CedielHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Pau CodinaHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen RivasHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana PulidoHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva CrespoHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia VelayosHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Violeta DiazHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni Bayes-GenisHeart Failure Clinic and Cardiology Service, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe criteria for patients with heart failure (HF) and improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) are a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, a ≥10-point increase from baseline LVEF, and a second LVEF measurement >40%. We aimed to (i) assess patients with HF and reduced LVEF (HFrEF) at baseline and compare quality of life (QoL) changes between those that fulfilled and those that did not fulfil the HFimpEF criteria 1 year later and (ii) assess the prognostic role of QoL in patients with HFimpEF.

methodsWe reviewed data from a prospective registry of real-world outpatients with HF that were assessed for LVEF and QoL at a first visit to the HF clinic and 1 year later. QoL was evaluated with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). The primary prognostic endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization.

resultsBaseline and 1-year LVEF and MLWFQ scores were available for 1040 patients with an initial LVEF ≤40% (mean age, 65.2 ± 11.7 years; 75.9% men). The main aetiology was ischaemic heart disease (52.9%), and patients were mostly in New York heart Association Classes II (71.1%) and III (21.6%). At baseline, the mean LVEF was 28.5% ± 7.3, and the mean MLWHFQ score was 30.2 ± 19.5. After 1 year, the mean LVEF increased to 38.0% ± 12.2, and the MLWHFQ scores improved to 17.4 ± 16.0. In 361 patients that fulfilled the HFimpEF criteria (34.7%), significant improvements were observed in both LVEF (from 28.7% ± 6.6 to 50.9% ± 7.6, P < 0.001) and QoL (from 32.9 ± 20.6 to 16.9 ± 16.0, P < 0.001). Patients that did not fulfil the HFimpEF criteria also showed significant improvements in LVEF (from 28.4% ± 7.6 to 31.1% ± 7.9, P < 0.001) and QoL (from 28.7 ± 18.8 to 17.6 ± 15.9, P < 0.001). However, the QoL improvement was significantly higher in the HFimpEF group (-16.0 ± 23.8 vs. -11.1 ± 20.3, P = 0.001), despite the worse mean baseline MLWHFQ score, compared with the non-HFimpEF group (P = 0.001). The 1-year QoL was similar between groups (P = 0.50). The 1-year MLWHFQ score was independently associated with outcomes; the hazard ratio for the composite endpoint was 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P = 0.006). In contrast, the QoL improvement (with a cut-off ≥5 points) was not independently associated with the composite outcome.

conclusionsPatients with HFrEF showed improved QoL after 1 year, regardless of whether they met the HFimpEF criteria. The similar 1-year QoL perception between groups suggested that factors other than LVEF influenced QoL perception. The 1-year QoL was superior to the QoL change from baseline for predicting prognosis in patients with HFimpEF.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Function, LeftAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisQuality of LifeStroke VolumeHeart failureHeart failure with improved ejection fractionLeft ventricular ejection fractionOutcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35916351
PMCPMC9773756
OpenAlexW4289524802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.