Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915812›Full record

ArticleClinical simulation in nursing2021

Use of Virtually Facilitated Simulation to Improve COVID-19 Preparedness in Rural and Remote Canada.

Sharon Reece, Monika Johnson, Kristin Simard, Annamaria Mundell, Nadine Terpstra, Theresa Cronin, Mirette Dubé, Alyshah Kaba, Vincent Grant

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical simulation in nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharon ReeceDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Monika JohnsoneSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kristin SimardeSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Annamaria MundelleSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nadine TerpstraeSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Theresa CronineSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mirette DubéeSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alyshah KabaeSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Vincent GranteSIM Provincial Simulation Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Alberta Health Services' Provincial Simulation Program (eSIM) is Canada's largest simulation program. The eSIM mobile simulation program specializes in delivering simulation-based education (SBE) to rural and remote communities (RRC). During the COVID-19 pandemic, a quality improvement project involving rapid cycle Methods: Between April 24 and July 31, 2020, a team of six rural simulationists (four nurses and two physicians) provided 24 VFS sessions with virtual debriefing to 200 health care providers distributed across 11 RRC in Alberta and the Northwest Territories, covering a geographic area of approximately 169,028 km Results: Video analysis of sequential VFS rapid cycle sessions using a standardized observational tool indicated decreased personal protective equipment (PPE) breaches by 36.6% between the first and third cycles. Teams demonstrated increased competency with airway management such as correct use of bag-valve-mask ventilation, and implementation of health system process improvements, such as incorporation of an intubation checklist. Improvements occurred on average over 2.2 rapid cycles completed within 1.3 weeks per RRC. Postsession self-reported participant electronic surveys indicated self-reported improvement in clinical management, teamwork behavior, and health systems issues outcome measures which were categorized based on the Crisis Resource Management and Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) frameworks. Of the 48 survey respondents, 86.1% reported that VFS was equivalent or superior to in-person simulation. The cost of VFS was 62.9% lower than comparable in-person SBE. Conclusion: VFS provides a rapidly mobilizable and cost-effective way of delivering high-quality SBE to geographically isolated communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19quality improvementremote medicineRural medicinesimulation-based educationtelesimulationvirtually facilitated simulation

Identifiers

PMID35915812
PMCPMC9329729
OpenAlexW3132270648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.