Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915798›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Laryngotracheal Separation Procedures for Radiotherapy-Related Intractable Aspiration Pneumonia in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Wei Gu, Jian Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei GuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7221-3887
Jian WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-7829
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intractable aspiration and aspiration pneumonia are complications after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and they may be life-threatening in severe cases. In the past, the efficacy of controlling aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in such patients was not ideal. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of tracheoesophageal diversion and laryngotracheal separation (TED-LTS) procedures for these patients. Results: Intractable aspiration and aspiration pneumonia were completely controlled in all cases, and the patients' body weight increased from 46.46 ± 4.6 (38.9-50.3) kg to 55.32 ± 2.7 (51.4-56.7) kg. Four patients were able to consume an oral semisolid diet, and one patient maintained an oral liquid diet. Tube feeding was not required in 4 patients. One patient developed postoperative esophageal fistula, which improved after conservative treatment. Conclusion: TED-LTS is effective for intractable aspiration and aspiration pneumonia caused by NPC radiotherapy and can be used to restore partial oral feeding. However, strict surgical indications should be followed.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersLarynxNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPneumonia, AspirationBody WeightHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTrachea

Identifiers

PMID35915798
PMCPMC9338871
OpenAlexW4286770976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.