Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915774›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the purpose in life test - Short form (PIL-SF) in seven Latin American countries.

Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Lindsey W Vilca, Mauricio Cervigni, Miguel Gallegos, Pablo Martino, Manuel Calandra, Cesar Armando Rey Anacona, Claudio López-Calle, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Edgardo René Chacón-Andrade and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Tomás Caycho-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Av. Alfredo Mendiola 6062, Los Olivos, Lima Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5349-7570
Lindsey W VilcaSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Mauricio CervigniFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Miguel GallegosUniversidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Pablo MartinoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Manuel CalandraFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Cesar Armando Rey AnaconaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia.
Claudio López-CalleFacultad de Psicología, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Rodrigo Moreta-HerreraEscuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador.
Edgardo René Chacón-AndradeEscuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Marlon Elías Lobos-RiveraEscuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Perla Del CarpioUniversidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Yazmín QuinteroUniversidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Erika RoblesUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Mexico, Toluca, Mexico.
Macerlo Panza LombardoUniversidad Nacional del Este, Ciudad del Este, Paraguay.
Olivia Gamarra RecaldeSensorium, Asunción, Paraguay.
Andrés Buschiazzo FigaresCentro de Estudios Adlerianos, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Michael WhiteFacultad de Ciencias Humanas y Educación, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.
Carmen Burgos VidelaInstituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales y Educación, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó, Chile.
Carlos Carbajal-LeónFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to test the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PIL-SF in a sample of people from seven Latin American countries. Additionally, the characteristics of the PIL-SF items were evaluated and to assess the relationship between purpose in life, as measured by the PIL-SF, and fear of COVID-19. A total of 4306 people from seven Latin American countries participated in the study. The results indicated that the PIL-SF is invariant in the seven participating countries and, therefore, there is evidence that the items reflect the purpose of life in the same way in all countries. This allows comparisons of purpose in life between countries that are free of bias, reflecting the true differences in how countries respond to items. From IRT, the discrimination parameters are adequate and indicate that the items cover a wide range of the purpose in life construct. The difficulty parameters are adequate and increase monotonically. This indicates that people would need a higher level of purpose in life to respond to the higher response categories. Thus, the PIL-SF items would be useful in determining people with a relatively high degree of purpose in life. Identifying people with different levels of purpose in life would allow them to be part of intervention programs, either to support those with low levels or to maintain and reinforce their purpose in life. The evidence of cross-country measurement invariance of the PIL-SF provides a measure to be used in cross-cultural studies about the meaning of life.

Indexed as

Item response theoryLatin AmericaMeasurement invariancePurpose in life, cross-cultural research/comparison

Identifiers

PMID35915774
PMCPMC9331043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.