Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915754›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2022

Effects of six weeks outdoor

Gaurav Singh, Gaurav Kushwah, Tanvi Singh, Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Rohit K Thapa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaurav SinghSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar, India.
Gaurav KushwahSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar, India.
Tanvi SinghSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar, India.
Rodrigo Ramírez-CampilloExercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-3279
Rohit K ThapaSchool of Physical Education and Sports, Rashtriya Raksha University, Gandhinagar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1258-9065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Running as exercise may be performed either on an outdoor surface or treadmill surface. However, previous research has indicated that the nature of both the surfaces differ significantly and therefore the training outcomes from running in these surfaces may also vary. Aim: Therefore, the aim of this pilot study was to compare the effects of 6-weeks of supervised outdoor running (OT) Methods: Participants (age: 19.82 ± 1.28 years, height: 172.6 ± 4.9 cm, body mass: 64.3 ± 8.7 kg) were randomly assigned to OT ( Results: Significant time-effect was found in all physical fitness variables (all Conclusions: Both OT and TT improved physical fitness and decreased fat percentage. However, compared to TT, the OT intervention preserved leg SMM and induced greater physical fitness improvements.

Indexed as

Exercise TestPhysical FitnessAdolescentAdultBody CompositionExerciseHumansMalePilot ProjectsYoung AdultAthletic performanceExerciseHigh-intensity interval trainingHuman physical conditioningMotor activityMovementMuscle strengthMusculoskeletal and neural physiological phenomenaPhysical activityPhysical exertion

Identifiers

PMID35915754
PMCPMC9338755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.