Trial reportPeerJ2022
Postoperative pain intensity and incidence following single visit root canal treatment with different obturation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of different obturation techniques on post-obturation pain and sealer extrusion in single-visit root canal treatment: a prospective clinical randomized study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Effect of different obturation techniques on treatment results in single-visit non-surgical endodontic retreatment: randomized controlled clinical study.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Frequency in Single-Session Endodontic Treatments With Patency and Foraminal Enlargement.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing Sealing Ability of C-Root SP Strontium Silicate Sealer With Different Obturation Techniques: An in vitro Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- An Observational Study on Pain Occurrence After Root Canal Treatment: Role of Operator Experience When Using a Bioceramic Sealer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Short-Term Efficacy of Vitapex Paste in Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment for Acute Irreversible Pulpitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Articaine Needle - Free Anesthesia Vs Conventional Anesthesia in Root Canal Treatment of Irreversible Pulpitis in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Study on Anesthetic Efficacy and Effects on Pain.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Analysis of postoperative pain after single versus multiple-visit root canal treatment in molars.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Post-operative pain after root canal filling with two different obturation techniques: A prospective study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are few studies in the literature about the effect of obturation techniques on postoperative pain. Besides, GuttaFlow2 was used for the first time in this study regarding postoperative pain. This study aimed to compare the postoperative pain levels and incidence following single-visit root canal treatment with different canal filling techniques; cold lateral compaction (CLC), thermoplasticised solid-core carrier (GuttaCore) based filling and cold free-flow compaction (GuttaFlow2) technique. Methods: The patients ( Results: The GuttaCore group recorded the higher pain levels, except first 12 h, on the other hand, the GuttaFlow2 group recorded the lower pain levels at all time periods. Significant differences occurred among the groups during the first 4 days ( Conclusions: Postoperative pain levels following root canal therapy were affected by the obturation technique especially first 4 days following obturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.