Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915701›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Probiotics Against Endodontic Pathogens.

Garapati Venkata Charan Teja, Mahali Raghu Nandana Raju, Uppu Lavanya Neelima Reddy, Uppalapati V V Satyanarayana, Devatha Praneeth, Kumpatla Maheswari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Garapati Venkata Charan TejaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, IND.
Mahali Raghu Nandana RajuDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, IND.
Uppu Lavanya Neelima ReddyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, IND.
Uppalapati V V SatyanarayanaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, IND.
Devatha PraneethDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, IND.
Kumpatla MaheswariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimDespite scientific evidence that even some microorganisms may be useful, endodontic intervention has persisted to prioritize the removal of all microorganisms from the root canal system. Indeed, information regarding the significant role of probiotic microorganisms in endodontic treatment has been sparse. This study aimed to carry out an in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of probiotics against endodontic pathogens.

methodsThe evaluation was carried out in three stages. In Stage 1, the agar cup well procedure was used to analyse the efficiency of probiotics microorganisms against

resultsThere was marked antimicrobial activity of probiotic microorganisms against the pathogenic microorganisms

conclusionIt can be concluded that probiotic therapy is a promising antibacterial treatment approach that should be further investigated. This study shows that probiotics can help effectively in endodontic treatment and that more in vitro as well as in vivo research is needed to fully appreciate the advantages of bacteriotherapy in the field of endodontics.

Indexed as

candida albicanse. faecalisendodontic pathogensin vitroprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35915701
PMCPMC9338782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.