ArticleKnowledge-based systems2022
Deep learning and machine learning-based voice analysis for the detection of COVID-19: A proposal and comparison of architectures.
Article in Knowledge-based systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Dual-Model Framework with Gramian Angular Field and Spatio-Temporal Attention for Rapid Gas Identification and Concentration Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Human Voice as a Digital Health Solution Leveraging Artificial Intelligence.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Acoustic and Clinical Data Analysis of Vocal Recordings: Pandemic Insights and Lessons.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sound as a bell: a deep learning approach for health status classification through speech acoustic biomarkers.Chinese medicine · 2024Article
- Applications to augment patient care for Internal Medicine specialists: a position paper from the EFIM working group on telemedicine, innovative technologies & digital health.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Acoustic Analysis and Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Smartphone-Recorded Voice Segments.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- High-Level CNN and Machine Learning Methods for Speaker Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Acoustic Analysis of Speech for Screening for Suicide Risk: Machine Learning Classifiers for Between- and Within-Person Evaluation of Suicidality.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Voice Assessment of Patients with Parkinson's Disease Off and On Treatment: Machine vs. Deep-Learning Comparison.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Severity Classification Using Dynamic Time Warping-Based Voice Biomarkers for Patients With COVID-19: Feasibility Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Acoustic analysis in stuttering: a machine-learning study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Detection of disease on nasal breath sound by new lightweight architecture: Using COVID-19 as an example.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alongside the currently used nasal swab testing, the COVID-19 pandemic situation would gain noticeable advantages from low-cost tests that are available at any-time, anywhere, at a large-scale, and with real time answers. A novel approach for COVID-19 assessment is adopted here, discriminating negative subjects versus positive or recovered subjects. The scope is to identify potential discriminating features, highlight mid and short-term effects of COVID on the voice and compare two custom algorithms. A pool of 310 subjects took part in the study; recordings were collected in a low-noise, controlled setting employing three different vocal tasks. Binary classifications followed, using two different custom algorithms. The first was based on the coupling of boosting and bagging, with an AdaBoost classifier using Random Forest learners. A feature selection process was employed for the training, identifying a subset of features acting as clinically relevant biomarkers. The other approach was centered on two custom CNN architectures applied to mel-Spectrograms, with a custom knowledge-based data augmentation. Performances, evaluated on an independent test set, were comparable: Adaboost and CNN differentiated COVID-19 positive from negative with accuracies of 100% and 95% respectively, and recovered from negative individuals with accuracies of 86.1% and 75% respectively. This study highlights the possibility to identify COVID-19 positive subjects, foreseeing a tool for on-site screening, while also considering recovered subjects and the effects of COVID-19 on the voice. The two proposed novel architectures allow for the identification of biomarkers and demonstrate the ongoing relevance of traditional ML versus deep learning in speech analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.