Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915642›Full record

ArticleKnowledge-based systems2022

Deep learning and machine learning-based voice analysis for the detection of COVID-19: A proposal and comparison of architectures.

Giovanni Costantini, Valerio Cesarini Dr, Carlo Robotti, Marco Benazzo, Filomena Pietrantonio, Stefano Di Girolamo, Antonio Pisani, Pietro Canzi, Simone Mauramati, Giulia Bertino and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knowledge-based systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni CostantiniDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Valerio Cesarini DrDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Carlo RobottiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Marco BenazzoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Filomena PietrantonioInternal Medicine Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli ASL Roma 6, Ariccia, Italy.
Stefano Di GirolamoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Antonio PisaniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Pietro CanziDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Simone MauramatiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giulia BertinoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Irene CassanitiMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Fausto BaldantiDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni SaggioDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITASL Roma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alongside the currently used nasal swab testing, the COVID-19 pandemic situation would gain noticeable advantages from low-cost tests that are available at any-time, anywhere, at a large-scale, and with real time answers. A novel approach for COVID-19 assessment is adopted here, discriminating negative subjects versus positive or recovered subjects. The scope is to identify potential discriminating features, highlight mid and short-term effects of COVID on the voice and compare two custom algorithms. A pool of 310 subjects took part in the study; recordings were collected in a low-noise, controlled setting employing three different vocal tasks. Binary classifications followed, using two different custom algorithms. The first was based on the coupling of boosting and bagging, with an AdaBoost classifier using Random Forest learners. A feature selection process was employed for the training, identifying a subset of features acting as clinically relevant biomarkers. The other approach was centered on two custom CNN architectures applied to mel-Spectrograms, with a custom knowledge-based data augmentation. Performances, evaluated on an independent test set, were comparable: Adaboost and CNN differentiated COVID-19 positive from negative with accuracies of 100% and 95% respectively, and recovered from negative individuals with accuracies of 86.1% and 75% respectively. This study highlights the possibility to identify COVID-19 positive subjects, foreseeing a tool for on-site screening, while also considering recovered subjects and the effects of COVID-19 on the voice. The two proposed novel architectures allow for the identification of biomarkers and demonstrate the ongoing relevance of traditional ML versus deep learning in speech analysis.

Indexed as

1E, Vowel /e/ vocal task2S, Sentence vocal task3C, Cough vocal taskAdaboostCFS, Correlation-based Feature SelectionClassificationCNN, Convolutional Neural NetworkCOVID-19Deep learningDL, Deep LearningH, Healthy control subjectsMFCC, Mel-frequency Cepstral CoefficientsML, Machine LearningNS, Nasal SwabPCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction-based molecular swabsP, Positive subjectsPvsH, Positive versus Healthy subjects comparisonReLu, Rectified Linear UnitRF, Random ForestROC, Receiver-Operating CurveR, Recovered subjectsRvsH, Recovered versus Healthy subjects comparisonSpeech processingSVM, Support Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35915642
PMCPMC9328841
OpenAlexW4288069892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.