ReviewCureus2022
Absolute Versus Relative Changes in Cardiac Troponins in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-Mortem Biomarkers in Sudden Cardiac Death: From Classical Biochemistry to Molecular Autopsy and Multi-Omics Forensic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Postoperative Myocardial Infarction after Non-Cardiac Surgery: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the leading causes of death globally. Rapid diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) will enable earlier initiation of the treatment and improve patient outcomes. Practice guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) had listed the diagnostic performance of absolute versus relative changes in evidence gaps. We aimed to address this evidence gap by examining the diagnostic accuracy of absolute versus relative changes in cardiac troponins at various time intervals in diagnosing MI. Grey literature, conference abstracts, animal studies, and reports published before 2009 and in languages other than English were excluded. We included reports that investigated absolute or relative changes in highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) or sensitive/highly sensitive cardiac troponin I (s/hs-cTnI) assays after specific time intervals (1, 2, or 3 h) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of the acute coronary syndrome. After screening, we arranged the reports in 12 separate groups based on the variables for which the data was reported. Quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The weighted summary area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each pool. We then performed two-sided (or two-tailed) tests to compare independent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. MedCalc version 20.106 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) was used for all statistical analysis. We included eight reports with 23,450 patients in the meta-analysis. Weighted summary estimates and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) under random-effects model for ROC-AUC are as follows: absolute hs-cTnI at 1 h - 0.94 (95% CI: 0.922 to 0.959, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 1 h - 0.921 (95% CI: 0.902 to 0.941, p < 0.001); absolute s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.953 (95% CI: 0.926 to 0.980, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 2 h 0.951 (95% CI: 0.940 to 0.962, p < 0.001); relative hs-cTnT at 2 h - 0.818 (95% CI: 0.733 to 0.903, p < 0.001); relative s/hs-cTnI at 2 h - 0.762 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.798, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnI at 3 h - 0.967 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.984, p < 0.001); absolute hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.959 (95% CI: 0.950 to 0.968, p < 0.001); and relative hs-cTnT at 3 h - 0.926 (95% CI: 0.907 to 0.945, p < 0.001). P-values of comparison of absolute and relative changes are as follows: hs-cTnT at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnI at 1 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 2 h: 0.0024; s/hs-cTnI at 2 h: <0.0001; hs-cTnT at 3 h: 0.0022; and hs-cTnI at 3 h: 0.0005. Our analysis found absolute changes to be superior to relative changes in both hs-cTnT and s/hs-cTnI at 1, 2, and 3 h in the diagnosis of MI. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing s/hs-cTnI vs. hs-cTnT using absolute or relative changes at any time interval. Our findings suggest that future research investigating a potential 0 h/30 min algorithm should use absolute Δ over relative Δ. A suboptimal number of reports in the groups limited our ability to establish the robustness of the results. We did not receive any funding for this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.