ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery
A newer method of seroma reduction by fenestration of pseudo-sac during laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: A randomised, controlled pilot study.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of sac transection versus sac reduction on seroma in laparoscopic indirect hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Plication of fascia transversalis in comparison to no plication to reduce seroma formation post laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for direct inguinal hernia : a randomized controlled trial.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of seroma formation in mesh fixation techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Repair of Inguinal Bladder Hernia.IJU case reports · 2025Article
- Effect of scrotal support application on seroma formation following minimal access surgery for inguinal hernia: A randomised controlled trial.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgeries for inguinal hernia repair have been reduced post-operative morbidity. However, certain complications such as seroma formation are unavoidable. In this study, we introduce a newer technique of reducing seroma formation by fenestration of the pseudo-sac (thickened transversalis fascia) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair for uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia. Patients and Methods: A randomised, controlled pilot study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2020 for the patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair for uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia. Study participants were randomised into interventional group and control groups. Demographics, operative duration and complications including post-operative pain and seroma on days 1, 10 and 30 were analysed between both the groups. Results: A total of 20 cases with 30 hernias were included in the study. Demographic data were comparable between the two groups. The intervention group showed a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of seroma formation on the post-operative day 10 (13.3% vs. 46.6%, P = 0.046). The mean volume of seroma on day 10 was also less compared to the non-fenestration group (2.5 vs. 6.58 ml, P = 0.048). After the 30 Conclusion: Fenestration of pseudo-sac in laparoscopic hernia repair for uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia is a simple and effective technique. It has reduced the incidence and volume of seroma formation without any increased risk of infection, acute or chronic pain and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.