Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915508›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Differential richness inference for 16S rRNA marker gene surveys.

M Senthil Kumar, Eric V Slud, Christine Hehnly, Lijun Zhang, James Broach, Rafael A Irizarry, Steven J Schiff, Joseph N Paulson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M Senthil KumarDepartment of Data Science, The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. senthil@ds.dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3220-6842
Eric V SludDepartment of Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Christine Hehnly *Penn State Institute for Personalized Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Lijun Zhang *Penn State Institute for Personalized Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
James BroachPenn State Institute for Personalized Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Rafael A IrizarryDepartment of Data Science, The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-4309
Steven J Schiff *Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Joseph N Paulson *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. jpaulson@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-7139
Pennsylvania State University · USBoston University · USUnited States Census Bureau · USYale University · US

Funding

Predictive Personalized Public Health (P3H): A Novel Paradigm to Treat Infectious DiseaseR01AI145057 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIFF, STEVEN J · 2018 to 2022
$8.1M
Data Analysis Tools for Emerging High-Throughput TechnologiesR35GM131802 · NIGMS · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Rafael Angel Irizarry · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145057NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual and environmental health outcomes are frequently linked to changes in the diversity of associated microbial communities. Thus, deriving health indicators based on microbiome diversity measures is essential. While microbiome data generated using high-throughput 16S rRNA marker gene surveys are appealing for this purpose, 16S surveys also generate a plethora of spurious microbial taxa.

resultsWhen this artificial inflation in the observed number of taxa is ignored, we find that changes in the abundance of detected taxa confound current methods for inferring differences in richness. Experimental evidence, theory-guided exploratory data analyses, and existing literature support the conclusion that most sub-genus discoveries are spurious artifacts of clustering 16S sequencing reads. We proceed to model a 16S survey's systematic patterns of sub-genus taxa generation as a function of genus abundance to derive a robust control for false taxa accumulation. These controls unlock classical regression approaches for highly flexible differential richness inference at various levels of the surveyed microbial assemblage: from sample groups to specific taxa collections. The proposed methodology for differential richness inference is available through an R package, Prokounter.

conclusionsFalse species discoveries bias richness estimation and confound differential richness inference. In the case of 16S microbiome surveys, supporting evidence indicate that most sub-genus taxa are spurious. Based on this finding, a flexible method is proposed and is shown to overcome the confounding problem noted with current approaches for differential richness inference. Package availability: https://github.com/mskb01/prokounter.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaArtifactsCluster AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDifferential richnessFalse discoveriesMicrobiomeRichnessSpecies misclassificationSpuriousSurveys

Identifiers

PMID35915508
PMCPMC9344657
OpenAlexW4289238779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.