Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915505›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

Evaluation of home-based naturopathic telehealth clinic: an innovative COVID-19 pandemic response.

Tracelee Shew, Catherine Smith, Greg Connolly, Craig S McLachlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tracelee ShewHealth, Torrens University Australia, 17-51 Foveaux St, Surry Hills, Sydney, 2010, Australia. tshew@torrens.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-3788
Catherine SmithHealth, Torrens University Australia, 17-51 Foveaux St, Surry Hills, Sydney, 2010, Australia.
Greg ConnollyHealth, Torrens University Australia, 196 Flinders St, Melbourne, 3000, Australia.
Craig S McLachlanCentre for Healthy Futures, Torrens University Australia, 17-51 Foveaux St, Surry Hills, Sydney, 2010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic in Australia disrupted usual clinical training placements for naturopathic students. An innovative, remote Telehealth clinic was developed and implemented. This pilot study evaluates student and educator learning and teaching experiences in Telehealth. A survey assessed Likert and qualitative written responses to student and staff interaction with the Telehealth clinic.

resultsNine student and 12 educator responses were included in the analysis. All students positively rated Telehealth training resources and the educator support provided. Students rated the Telehealth learning experience as 'very good' (78%) or 'good' (22%) with educator ratings of 'very good' (67%) or 'good' (33%). Thematic analysis of student written responses showed increased client diversity, collaboration, peer learning, increased feedback, and improved digital and technology skills. Virtual physical examination and infrastructure limitations were reported as Telehealth clinical practicum challenges. Naturopathic Telehealth clinic practicum is a valuable alternative to in-person clinical practicums for Australian students. It enhances student collaboration and peer learning. Challenges of technology, infrastructure and incorporating Telehealth in curriculum may be barriers to implementation of Telehealth. However, Telehealth is an important clinical training option to prepare student practitioners for contemporary professional practice if in-person consultation is prohibitive, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAustraliaHumansPandemicsPilot ProjectsClinical PracticumCollaborativeEducationNaturopathyPeer learningTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35915505
PMCPMC9342589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.