Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915430›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

An interpretable neural network for outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury.

Cristian Minoccheri, Craig A Williamson, Mark Hemmila, Kevin Ward, Erica B Stein, Jonathan Gryak, Kayvan Najarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristian MinoccheriDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. minoc@umich.edu.
Craig A WilliamsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Mark HemmilaMax Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Kevin WardMax Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Erica B SteinDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jonathan GryakDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Kayvan NajarianDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a common condition with potentially severe long-term complications, the prediction of which remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) methods have been used previously to help physicians predict long-term outcomes of TBI so that appropriate treatment plans can be adopted. However, many ML techniques are "black box": it is difficult for humans to understand the decisions made by the model, with post-hoc explanations only identifying isolated relevant factors rather than combinations of factors. Moreover, such models often rely on many variables, some of which might not be available at the time of hospitalization.

methodsIn this study, we apply an interpretable neural network model based on tropical geometry to predict unfavorable outcomes at six months from hospitalization in TBI patients, based on information available at the time of admission.

resultsThe proposed method is compared to established machine learning methods-XGBoost, Random Forest, and SVM-achieving comparable performance in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)-0.799 for the proposed method vs. 0.810 for the best black box model. Moreover, the proposed method allows for the extraction of simple, human-understandable rules that explain the model's predictions and can be used as general guidelines by clinicians to inform treatment decisions.

conclusionsThe classification results for the proposed model are comparable with those of traditional ML methods. However, our model is interpretable, and it allows the extraction of intelligible rules. These rules can be used to determine relevant factors in assessing TBI outcomes and can be used in situations when not all necessary factors are known to inform the full model's decision.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMachine LearningPrognosisROC CurveClinical decision support systemsInterpretable machine learningNeural networksOutcome predictionTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35915430
PMCPMC9341077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.