Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915406›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Assessment of management approaches for hyperemesis gravidarum and nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a retrospective questionnaire analysis.

Rachel Mares, Adelene Morrow, Haley Shumway, Isain Zapata, David Forstein, Benjamin Brooks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sensory signals for nausea.Trends in neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GDF15 Targeting for Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Mares *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 255 E. Center St, Ivins, UT, 84738, USA.
Adelene Morrow *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 255 E. Center St, Ivins, UT, 84738, USA.
Haley ShumwayDepartment of Obstetrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA.
Isain ZapataDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, 80134, USA.
David ForsteinRocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Office of the President, Parker, CO, 80134, USA.
Benjamin BrooksDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 255 E. Center St, Ivins, UT, 84738, USA. bbrooks@rvu.edu.
Rocky Vista University · USCentral Michigan University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperemesis gravidarum is the most severe form of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, or morning sickness. 2% of pregnancies in the United States are affected by hyperemesis gravidarum. The condition is characterized by severe vomiting in pregnant people, especially during the first trimester, often leading to hypovolemia and weight loss. The standard of care for hyperemesis and nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is commonly ineffective. We hypothesize that based on patient experience; the current treatment guidelines for hyperemesis are not clinically effective. Our objective was to identify the efficacy of the various management approaches that are currently in place for hyperemesis and nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.

methodsA questionnaire was designed based on diagnostic criteria, standard demographic identifiers, and common medications for the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. This questionnaire was distributed online to through hyperemesis and nausea and vomiting of pregnancy support groups, personal social media, and institutional email.

resultsIn our study, most participants diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum trialed at least three medications, most of which were ineffective and/or had severe side effects. The most used medication for treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum is ondansetron, a standard antiemetic, with fatigue and constipation being the most reported side effects. All data in the dataset was coded as categorical and analyzed using contingency tables using Mantel-Haenszel Chi square tests.

conclusionsThe data presented in this research provides insight into the suffering that patients with these diagnoses face day-to-day due to the lack of efficacious, well-tolerated treatment options. Establishing this gap in treatment can facilitate the development of effective treatments that will provide relief for thousands of patients.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsHyperemesis GravidarumFemaleHumansNauseaPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAntiemeticsHyperemesis GravidarumMorning sicknessNauseaNausea and vomiting of pregnancyPregnancyQuality of lifeVomiting

Identifiers

PMID35915406
PMCPMC9341047
OpenAlexW4289341705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.