ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
A New Collaborative Classification Process for Microcalcification Detection Based on Graphs and Knowledge Propagation.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new collaborative process that aims to detect macrocalcifications from mammographic images while minimizing false negative detections. This process is made up of three main phases: suspicious area detection, candidate object identification, and collaborative classification. The main concept is to operate on the entire image divided into homogenous regions called superpixels which are used to identify both suspicious areas and candidate objects. The collaborative classification phase consists in making the initial results of different microcalcification detectors collaborate in order to produce a new common decision and reduce their initial disagreements. The detectors share the information about their detected objects and associated labels in order to refine their initial decisions based on those of the other collaborators. This refinement consists of iteratively updating the candidate object labels of each detector following local and contextual analyses based on prior knowledge about the links between super pixels and macrocalcifications. This process iteratively reduces the disagreement between different detectors and estimates local reliability terms for each super pixel. The final result is obtained by a conjunctive combination of the new detector decisions reached by the collaborative process. The proposed approach is evaluated on the publicly available INBreast dataset. Experimental results show the benefits gained in terms of improving microcalcification detection performances compared to existing detectors as well as ordinary fusion operators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.