Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915361›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Common, uncommon, and novel applications of random forest in psychological research.

Dustin A Fife, Juliana D'Onofrio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Leveraging Machine Learning to Uncover Ethnic-Specific Predictors of Maternal Postpartum Depression.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tutorial: Using Random Forest Analysis to Identify Auxiliary Variables of Missing Data.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Lower Striatal and Cortical Calretinin Interneuron Density Associated With Altered Social Behavior in Cntnap2 Knockout Mice.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine learning and probabilistic approaches for forecasting infectious disease transmission and cases.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dustin A FifeRowan University, Glassboro, NJ, United States. fife@rowan.edu.
Juliana D'OnofrioRowan University, Glassboro, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reform efforts have pushed toward a better understanding of the distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research, and appropriate use of each. As some utilize more exploratory tools, it may be tempting to employ multiple linear regression models. In this paper, we advocate for the use of random forest (RF) models. RF is able to obtain better predictive performance than traditional regression, while also inherently protecting against overfitting as well as detecting nonlinear effects and interactions among predictors. Given the advantages of RF compared to other statistical procedures, it is a tool commonly used within a plethora of industries, including stock trading, banking, pharmaceuticals, and patient healthcare planning. However, we find RF is used within the field of psychology comparatively less frequently. In the current paper, we advocate for RF as an important statistical tool within the context of behavioral and psychological research. In hopes of increasing the use of RF in the field of psychology, we provide information pertaining to the limitations one might confront in using RF and how to overcome such limitations. Moreover, we discuss various methods for how to optimally utilize RF with psychological data, such as nonparametric modeling, interaction and nonlinearity detection, variable selection, prediction and classification modeling, and assessing parameters of Monte Carlo simulations. Throughout, we illustrate the use of RF with visualization strategies, aimed to make RF models more comprehensible and intuitive.

Indexed as

Random ForestHumansLinear ModelsClassificationMultiple regressionPredictionVariable importance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.