Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915266›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2022

Genetic networks underlying salinity tolerance in wheat uncovered with genome-wide analyses and selective sweeps.

Danting Shan, Mohsin Ali, Mohammed Shahid, Anjuman Arif, Muhammad Qandeel Waheed, Xianchun Xia, Richard Trethowan, Mark Tester, Jesse Poland, Francis C Ogbonnaya and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Positive Regulatory Roles ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Danting ShanInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Mohsin AliInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Mohammed ShahidInternational Center for Biosaline Agriculture (ICBA), Al Ruwayyah 2, Academic City, Dubai, UAE.
Anjuman ArifNational Institute of Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Qandeel WaheedNational Institute of Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Xianchun XiaInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Richard TrethowanPlant Breeding Institute, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
Mark TesterDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KASUT), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Jesse PolandDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KASUT), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Francis C OgbonnayaGrains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), Kingston, Australia.
Awais RasheedInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China. arasheed@qau.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2528-708X
Zhonghu HeInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Huihui LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT-China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China. lihuihui@caas.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-5011
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology · PKGrains Research and Development Corporation · AUInternational Center for Biosaline Agriculture · AEKansas State University · USKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAThe University of Sydney · AUXinhui People's Hospital · CN

Funding

NSFC 32022064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA genetic framework underpinning salinity tolerance at reproductive stage was revealed by genome-wide SNP markers and major adaptability genes in synthetic-derived wheats, and trait-associated loci were used to predict phenotypes. Using wild relatives of crops to identify genes related to improved productivity and resilience to climate extremes is a prioritized area of crop genetic improvement. High salinity is a widespread crop production constraint, and development of salt-tolerant cultivars is a sustainable solution. We evaluated a panel of 294 wheat accessions comprising synthetic-derived wheat lines (SYN-DERs) and modern bread wheat advanced lines under control and high salinity conditions at two locations. The GWAS analysis revealed a quantitative genetic framework of more than 200 loci with minor effect underlying salinity tolerance at reproductive stage. The significant trait-associated SNPs were used to predict phenotypes using a GBLUP model, and the prediction accuracy (r

Indexed as

Salt ToleranceTriticumGene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID35915266
OpenAlexW4289262511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.