Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915183›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2022

Testicular salvage: using machine learning algorithm to develop a predictive model in testicular torsion.

Mithat Ekşi, Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan, İsmail Evren, Ali Ayten, Ali Emre Fakir, Fatih Akkaş, Kerem Bursali, Azad Akdağ, Selcuk Sahin, Ali İhsan Taşçi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long time follow-up for patients with testicular torsion: new findings.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mithat EkşiDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey. mithat_eksi@hotmail.com.
Abdullah Hizir YavuzsanDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Halaskargazi Cd, Şişli, 34371, Istanbul, Turkey.
İsmail EvrenDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali AytenDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Emre FakirDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih AkkaşDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kerem BursaliDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Azad AkdağDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selcuk SahinDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali İhsan TaşçiDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the models developed with a classical statistics method and a machine learning model to predict the possibility of orchiectomy using preoperative parameters in patients who were admitted with testicular torsion. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients who underwent scrotal exploration due to testicular torsion between the years 2000 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, features of admission time, and other preoperative clinical findings were recorded. Cox Regression Analysis as a classical statistics method and Random Forest as a Machine Learning algorithm was used to create a prediction model.

resultsAmong patients, 215 (71.6%) were performed orchidopexy and 85 (28.3%) were performed orchiectomy. The multivariate analysis revealed that monocyte count, symptom duration, and the number of previous Doppler ultrasonography were predictive of orchiectomy. Classical Cox regression analysis had an area under the curve (AUC) 0.937 with a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 87%. The AUC for the Random Forest model was 0.95 with a sensitivity and specificity of 92 and 89%.

conclusionThe ML model outperformed the conventional statistical regression model in the prediction of orchiectomy. The ML methods are cheap, and their powers increase with increasing data input; we believe that their clinical use will increase over time.

Indexed as

Spermatic Cord TorsionAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningMaleRetrospective StudiesTestisMachine learningOrchidopexyOrchiectomyTesticular salvageTesticular torsion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.