ArticleScientific reports2022
The spatial profile of skin indentation shapes tactile perception across stimulus frequencies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible microscale tactile display with liquid-to-gas phase-change actuator array.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Toward human-resolution haptics: A high-bandwidth, high-density, wearable tactile display.Science advances · 2025Article
- Flexible Tactile Sensing Systems: Challenges in Theoretical Research Transferring to Practical Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2025Review
- Passive human touch cannot recognize the shape of a pattern imprinted on the fingertip.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Decoding roughness perception in distributed haptic devices.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple human sensory systems exhibit sensitivity to spatial and temporal variations of physical stimuli. Vision has evolved to offer high spatial acuity with limited temporal sensitivity, while audition has developed complementary characteristics. Neural coding in touch has been believed to transition from a spatial to a temporal domain in relation to surface scale, such that coarse features (e.g., a braille cell or corduroy texture) are coded as spatially distributed signals, while fine textures (e.g., fine-grit sandpaper) are encoded by temporal variation. However, the interplay between the two domains is not well understood. We studied tactile encoding with a custom-designed pin array apparatus capable of deforming the fingerpad at 5 to 80 Hz in each of 14 individual locations spaced 2.5 mm apart. Spatial variation of skin indentation was controlled by moving each of the pins at the same frequency and amplitude, but with phase delays distributed across the array. Results indicate that such stimuli enable rendering of shape features at actuation frequencies up to 20 Hz. Even at frequencies > 20 Hz, however, spatial variation of skin indentation continues to play a vital role. In particular, perceived roughness is affected by spatial variation within the fingerpad even at 80 Hz. We provide evidence that perceived roughness is encoded via a summary measure of skin displacement. Relative displacements in neighboring pins of less than 10 µm generate skin stretch, which regulates the roughness percept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.