Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35915101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Elastic shell theory for plant cell wall stiffness reveals contributions of cell wall elasticity and turgor pressure in AFM measurement.

Satoru Tsugawa, Yuki Yamasaki, Shota Horiguchi, Tianhao Zhang, Takara Muto, Yosuke Nakaso, Kenshiro Ito, Ryu Takebayashi, Kazunori Okano, Eri Akita and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanics of compression-driven morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanics-based classification rule for plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoru TsugawaFaculty of Systems Science and Technology, Akita Prefectural University, 84-4 Yurihonjo, Akita, 015-0055, Japan. tsugawa@akita-pu.ac.jp.
Yuki YamasakiDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Shota HoriguchiInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Tianhao ZhangInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Takara MutoInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Yosuke NakasoInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Kenshiro ItoDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Ryu TakebayashiDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Kazunori OkanoDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Eri AkitaDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Ryohei YasukuniDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Taku DemuraDivision of Biological Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Tetsuro MimuraDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Ken'ichi KawaguchiInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Yoichiroh HosokawaDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan. hosokawa@ms.naist.jp.
Nara Institute of Science and Technology · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPAkita Prefectural University · JPAmada (Japan) · JPNational Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stiffness of a plant cell in response to an applied force is determined not only by the elasticity of the cell wall but also by turgor pressure and cell geometry, which affect the tension of the cell wall. Although stiffness has been investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Young's modulus of the cell wall has occasionally been estimated using the contact-stress theory (Hertz theory), the existence of tension has made the study of stiffness more complex. Elastic shell theory has been proposed as an alternative method; however, the estimation of elasticity remains ambiguous. Here, we used finite element method simulations to verify the formula of the elastic shell theory for onion (Allium cepa) cells. We applied the formula and simulations to successfully quantify the turgor pressure and elasticity of a cell in the plane direction using the cell curvature and apparent stiffness measured by AFM. We conclude that tension resulting from turgor pressure regulates cell stiffness, which can be modified by a slight adjustment of turgor pressure in the order of 0.1 MPa. This theoretical analysis reveals a path for understanding forces inherent in plant cells.

Indexed as

Cell WallPlant CellsElasticityElastic ModulusMicroscopy, Atomic ForceOnions

Identifiers

PMID35915101
PMCPMC9343428
OpenAlexW4289223570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.