ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022
Insights from analyses of low complexity regions with canonical methods for protein sequence comparison.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- GBSC: graph-based sequence clustering method for similar short tandem repeats in protein sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- CB-Search: a method for searching for similar protein motifs with biased compositions.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Protein language model identifies disordered, conserved motifs implicated in phase separation.eLife · 2025Article
- Low-complexity regions in fungi display functional groups and are depleted in positively charged amino acids.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Challenges in adjusting scoring matrices when comparing functional motifs with non-standard compositions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evolutionary model of repeat insertions in Ataxin-3 traces the origin of the polyglutamine stretch to an ancestral ubiquitin binding module.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- The interkingdom horizontal gene transfer in 44 early diverging fungi boosted their metabolic, adaptive, and immune capabilities.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes family in Salicaceae during grafting.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics tools for the sequence complexity estimates.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Role of TET1-mediated epigenetic modulation in Alzheimer's disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2023Article
- Ancient lineages of the keratin-associated protein (KRTAP) genes and their co-option in the evolution of the hair follicle.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low complexity regions are fragments of protein sequences composed of only a few types of amino acids. These regions frequently occur in proteins and can play an important role in their functions. However, scientists are mainly focused on regions characterized by high diversity of amino acid composition. Similarity between regions of protein sequences frequently reflect functional similarity between them. In this article, we discuss strengths and weaknesses of the similarity analysis of low complexity regions using BLAST, HHblits and CD-HIT. These methods are considered to be the gold standard in protein similarity analysis and were designed for comparison of high complexity regions. However, we lack specialized methods that could be used to compare the similarity of low complexity regions. Therefore, we investigated the existing methods in order to understand how they can be applied to compare such regions. Our results are supported by exploratory study, discussion of amino acid composition and biological roles of selected examples. We show that existing methods need improvements to efficiently search for similar low complexity regions. We suggest features that have to be re-designed specifically for comparing low complexity regions: scoring matrix, multiple sequence alignment, e-value, local alignment and clustering based on a set of representative sequences. Results of this analysis can either be used to improve existing methods or to create new methods for the similarity analysis of low complexity regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.