Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914819›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2022

Advances in Detector Instrumentation for PET.

Andrea Gonzalez-Montoro, Muhammad Nasir Ullah, Craig S Levin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Applicability and performance ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Imaging of intranasal drug delivery to the brain: updated review 2.0.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Decision Tree-Based Demultiplexing for Prism-PET.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea Gonzalez-MontoroDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Muhammad Nasir UllahDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Craig S LevinDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford University, Stanford, California; cslevin@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last 3 decades, PET has become a standard-of-care imaging technique used in the management of cancer and in the characterization of neurologic disorders and cardiovascular disease. It has also emerged as a prominent molecular imaging method to study the basic biologic pathways of disease in rodent models. This review describes the basics of PET detectors, including a detailed description of indirect and direct 511-keV photon detection methods. We will also cover key detector performance parameters and describe detector instrumentation advances during the last decade.

Indexed as

PhotonsPositron-Emission Tomographycoincidence time resolutionCTRPETscintillation detectorssemiconductor detectorsspatial and energy resolution

Identifiers

PMID35914819
PMCPMC9364348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.