Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914758›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2022

Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Jongmin Won, Jong Won Hong, Mi Jung Kim, In-Sik Yun, Woo Yeol Baek, Won Jai Lee, Dae Hyun Lew, Yoon Woo Koh, Se-Heon Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jongmin WonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-7915
Jong Won HongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hsaturn@hanmail.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7762-0940
Mi Jung KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7126-6661
In-Sik YunDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-7047
Woo Yeol BaekDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-4110
Won Jai LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-0503
Dae Hyun LewDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2625-5664
Yoon Woo KohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9734-1682
Se-Heon KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-5859
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

Yonsei University College of Medicine 6-2017-0065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobotic head and neck surgery is widespread nowadays. However, in the reconstruction field, the use of robotic operations is not. This article aimed to examine methodologies for conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic tumor surgery in an effort to obtain further options for future reconstruction manipulations. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review of all patients who received head and neck robot surgery and conventional reconstructive surgery between October 2016 and September 2021.

resultsIn total, 53 cases were performed. 67.9% of the tumors were greater than 4 cm. Regarding defect size, 47.2% of the lesions were greater than 8 cm. In terms of TNM stage, stage 3 disease was recorded in 26.4% and stage 4 in 52.8%. To make a deep and narrow field wider, we changed the patient's posture in pre-op field, additional dissection was done. We used radial forearm flap mostly (62.2%).

conclusionConventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic ENT cancer surgery is possible. One key step is to secure additional space in the deep and narrow space left after robotic surgery. For this, we opted for a radial forearm flap mostly. This can be performed as a bridgehead to perform robotic head and neck reconstruction.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsHead neck cancerplastic reconstructive surgeryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35914758
PMCPMC9344269
OpenAlexW4287155546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.