Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914420›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2022

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: The PAN-COVID study.

E Mullins, A Perry, J Banerjee, J Townson, D Grozeva, R Milton, N Kirby, R Playle, T Bourne, C Lees and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of SARS-Cov-2 exposure during pregnancy on child neurodevelopment: systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of COVID-19 respiratory conditions on pregnancy outcomes in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Do timing and severity of gestational COVID-19 impact perinatal and neonatal outcomes?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E MullinsImperial College London and The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK. Electronic address: Edward.mullins@imperial.ac.uk.
A PerryLead Research Midwife and Manager, Women's Health Research Centre, Imperial College London, W12 0HS, UK.
J BanerjeeImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, W12 0HS, UK.
J TownsonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
D GrozevaCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
R MiltonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
N KirbyCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
R PlayleCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
T BourneImperial College London, Consultant Gyanecologist, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK.
C LeesCentre for Fetal Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, UK.
PAN-COVID Investigators
Cardiff University · GBImperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess perinatal outcomes for pregnancies affected by suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

methodsProspective, web-based registry. Pregnant women were invited to participate if they had suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1st January 2020 and 31st March 2021 to assess the impact of infection on maternal and perinatal outcomes including miscarriage, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, pre-term birth and transmission to the infant.

resultsBetween April 2020 and March 2021, the study recruited 8239 participants who had suspected or confirmed SARs-CoV-2 infection episodes in pregnancy between January 2020 and March 2021. Maternal death affected 14/8197 (0.2%) participants, 176/8187 (2.2%) of participants required ventilatory support. Pre-eclampsia affected 389/8189 (4.8%) participants, eclampsia was reported in 40/ 8024 (0.5%) of all participants. Stillbirth affected 35/8187 (0.4 %) participants. In participants delivering within 2 weeks of delivery 21/2686 (0.8 %) were affected by stillbirth compared with 8/4596 (0.2 %) delivering ≥ 2 weeks after infection (95 % CI 0.3-1.0). SGA affected 744/7696 (9.3 %) of livebirths, FGR affected 360/8175 (4.4 %) of all pregnancies. Pre-term birth occurred in 922/8066 (11.5%), the majority of these were indicated pre-term births, 220/7987 (2.8%) participants experienced spontaneous pre-term births. Early neonatal deaths affected 11/8050 livebirths. Of all neonates, 80/7993 (1.0%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

conclusionsInfection was associated with indicated pre-term birth, most commonly for fetal compromise. The overall proportions of women affected by SGA and FGR were not higher than expected, however there was the proportion affected by stillbirth in participants delivering within 2 weeks of infection was significantly higher than those delivering ≥ 2 weeks after infection. We suggest that clinicians' threshold for delivery should be low if there are concerns with fetal movements or fetal heart rate monitoring in the time around infection. The proportion affected by pre-eclampsia amongst participants was not higher than would be expected, although we report a higher than expected proportion affected by eclampsia. There appears to be no effect on birthweight or congenital malformations in women affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and neonatal infection is uncommon. This study reflects a population with a range of infection severity for SARS-COV-2 in pregnancy, generalisable to whole obstetric populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19EclampsiaPre-EclampsiaPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2StillbirthCOVIDFetalFetal growth restrictionInfectionNeonatalPerinatalPregnancySARS-CoV-2Stillbirth

Identifiers

PMID35914420
PMCPMC9295331
OpenAlexW4285811080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.