Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35914239›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Chengyue Wu, Angela M Jarrett, Zijian Zhou, Nabil Elshafeey, Beatriz E Adrada, Rosalind P Candelaria, Rania M M Mohamed, Medine Boge, Lei Huo, Jason B White and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02276443 (ARTEMIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02276443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

ARTEMIS: A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2026Enrolled798ConditionsInvasive Breast Carcinoma, Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v7ArmsChemotherapy, Immunotherapy, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Lymph Node Biopsy, Ultrasonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Performance ofNPJ breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Learning Patient Similarity from Genomics for Precision Oncology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current progress of digital twin construction using medical imaging.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chengyue WuOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3789-404X
Angela M JarrettOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-9557
Zijian ZhouDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8976-8507
Nabil ElshafeeyDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Beatriz E AdradaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rosalind P CandelariaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-7896
Rania M M MohamedDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6487-3965
Medine BogeDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lei HuoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jason B WhiteDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-545X
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-7480
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8390-4985
Clinton YamDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jong Bum SonDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2548-5895
Jingfei MaDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gaiane M RauchDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2079-5202
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6201-3913
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USLivestrong Foundation · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

VIRAL ONCOLOGY CORE FACILITYP30CA014599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KUNLE ODUNSI · 1985 to 2026
$122.1M
Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
INTEGRATING OMICS AND QUANTITATIVE IMAGING DATA IN CO-CLINICAL TRIALS TO PREDICT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU24CA226110 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, MICHAEL T., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Detection of prostate Cancer Specific Signals with Hybrid Multi-Dimensional MRIR01CA228036 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., OTO, AYTEKIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014599NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228036NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NCI NIH HHS U24 CA226110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is persistently refractory to therapy, and methods to improve targeting and evaluation of responses to therapy in this disease are needed. Here, we integrate quantitative MRI data with biologically based mathematical modeling to accurately predict the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) on an individual basis. Specifically, 56 patients with TNBC enrolled in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443) underwent standard-of-care doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (A/C) and then paclitaxel for NAST, where dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI were acquired before treatment and after two and four cycles of A/C. A biologically based model was established to characterize tumor cell movement, proliferation, and treatment-induced cell death. Two evaluation frameworks were investigated using: (i) images acquired before and after two cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting tumor status after A/C, and (ii) images acquired before, after two cycles, and after four cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting response following NAST. For Framework 1, the concordance correlation coefficients between the predicted and measured patient-specific, post-A/C changes in tumor cellularity and volume were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. For Framework 2, the biologically based model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.89 (sensitivity/specificity = 0.72/0.95) for differentiating pathological complete response (pCR) from non-pCR, which is statistically superior (P < 0.05) to the value of 0.78 (sensitivity/specificity = 0.72/0.79) achieved by tumor volume measured after four cycles of A/C. Overall, this model successfully captured patient-specific, spatiotemporal dynamics of TNBC response to NAST, providing highly accurate predictions of NAST response. SIGNIFICANCE: Integrating MRI data with biologically based mathematical modeling successfully predicts breast cancer response to chemotherapy, suggesting digital twins could facilitate a paradigm shift from simply assessing response to predicting and optimizing therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID35914239
PMCPMC9481712
OpenAlexW4289277903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.